Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37090933›Full record

ArticleJournal of human rights practice2014

Examining the Practice of Developing Human Rights Indicators to Facilitate Accountability for the Human Right to Water and Sanitation.

Benjamin Mason Meier, Jocelyn Getgen Kestenbaum, Georgia Lyn Kayser, Urooj Quezon Amjad, Jamie Bartram

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of human rights practice, 2014. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 17 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Global monitoring of water supply and sanitation: history, methods and future challenges.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2014
    Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Benjamin Mason MeierDepartment of Public Policy at the University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (UNC).
Jocelyn Getgen KestenbaumClinical Law of the Human Rights and Genocide Clinic at the Benjamin N. Cardozo School of Law.
Georgia Lyn KayserWater Institute at UNC.
Urooj Quezon AmjadWater Institute at UNC.
Jamie BartramWater Institute at UNC.
University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · USAve Maria School of Law · US

Funding

Water Wisdom: Developing Local-Global Capacities in Managing WaterR24TW008810 · FIC · UNIV OF NORTH CAROLINA CHAPEL HILL · PI BENTLEY, MARGARET E · 2010 to 2010
$259k
FIC NIH HHS R24 TW008810
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Flowing from the evolution of international legal obligations for water and sanitation, human rights practice has shifted to address state accountability for a human right to water and sanitation through the development of human rights indicators. This policy note focuses on efforts to develop indicators for state reporting to human rights treaty bodies, with human rights norms framing national reports and treaty bodies employing indicators to monitor the progressive realization of the human right to water and sanitation. In supporting evidence-based treaty monitoring through the United Nations (UN), both the UN High Commissioner for Human Rights and the UN Special Rapporteur on the human right to safe drinking water and sanitation have sought to develop indicators. This process of developing indicators for the human right to water and sanitation seeks to draw on previous indicator development practices, looking to these practices in framing, identifying and reviewing indicators. As part of a larger drive to facilitate rights-based accountability, there arises an imperative to study the political process of developing indicators, looking to past models in structuring future processes to assess the realization of the right to water and sanitation. Exploring the development of indicators for the human rights to health and education, this policy note analyses the indicator development process, proposing an indicator development process model as a basis for developing indicators that reflect the attributes of the right to water and sanitation, enlist key stakeholders in the policymaking process and have political relevance for state reporting to treaty bodies.

Indexed as

accountabilityhuman rights treaty bodiesindicatorspost-2015 agendaUnited Nationswater and sanitation

Identifiers

PMID37090933
PMCPMC10120874
OpenAlexW2127909272

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.