Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37090855›Full record

ArticleMindfulness2023

How an Interest in Mindfulness Influences Linguistic Markers in Online Microblogging Discourse.

Clara Eugenia Rivera, Rebekah Jane Kaunhoven, Gemma Maria Griffith

Open access · hybridFull text read
In one paragraph

Article in Mindfulness, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 30% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Clara Eugenia RiveraCentre for Mindfulness Research and Practice, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Brigantia Building, Penrallt Road, Bangor, LL57 2AS UK.
Rebekah Jane KaunhovenCentre for Mindfulness Research and Practice, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Brigantia Building, Penrallt Road, Bangor, LL57 2AS UK.
Gemma Maria GriffithCentre for Mindfulness Research and Practice, School of Human and Behavioural Sciences, Bangor University, Brigantia Building, Penrallt Road, Bangor, LL57 2AS UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4192-8505
Bangor University · GB

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: This study aimed to investigate the linguistic markers of an interest in mindfulness. Specifically, it examined whether individuals who follow mindfulness experts on Twitter use different language in their tweets compared to a random sample of Twitter users. This is a first step which may complement commonly used self-report measures of mindfulness with quantifiable behavioural metrics. Method: A linguistic analysis examined the association between an interest in mindfulness and linguistic markers in 1.87 million Twitter entries across 19,732 users from two groups, (1) a mindfulness interest group ( Results: Analyses revealed an association between an interest in mindfulness and lexical choice. Specifically, tweets from the mindfulness interest group contained a significantly higher frequency of markers associated with mindfulness, positive emotion, happiness, and social orientation, and a significantly lower frequency of markers associated with negative emotion, past focus, present focus, future focus, family orientation, and friend orientation. Conclusions: Results from this study suggest that an interest in mindfulness is associated with more frequent use of certain language markers on Twitter. The analysis opens possible pathways towards developing more naturalistic methods of understanding and assessing mindfulness which may complement self-reporting methods.

Indexed as

BehaviourLanguageLinguistic markersLIWCMindfulnessPsycholinguisticsSpeechTwitter

Identifiers

PMID37090855
PMCPMC10020072
OpenAlexW4327735575

What OpenQuestion holds

Textfull text, public
LicenceCC BY
measurements read14
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.