Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37090785›Full record

ArticleManagement decision2023

Developing scientifically validated bias and diversity trainings that work: empowering agents of change to reduce bias, create inclusion, and promote equity.

William Taylor Laimaka Cox

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Management decision, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT06487351 (The Impact of an Intervention to Reduce Pharmacists' Racial Bias Towards People of Color at Risk of HIV), which is not on this map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06487351 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2027, after this paper: background citation

The Impact of an Intervention to Reduce Pharmacists' Racial Bias Towards People of Color at Risk of HIV

TypeinterventionalSponsorMassachusetts General HospitalRan2027 to 2029Enrolled70ConditionsBias, Implicit, HIV, Pre-exposure ProphylaxisArmsThe adapted PHBI, The NIH Implicit Bias course
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

1 author.

William Taylor Laimaka CoxDepartment of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, Wisconsin, USA.

Funding

Basic and Translational Research to Combat Stereotypes and Unintentional BiasesR35GM128888 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF WISCONSIN-MADISON · PI COX, WILLIAM TAYLOR LAIMAKA · 2018 to 2022
$1.9M
NIGMS NIH HHS R35 GM128888
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose –: Research consistently shows that non-scientific bias, equity, and diversity trainings do not work, and often make bias and diversity problems worse. Despite these widespread failures, there is considerable reason for hope that effective, meaningful DEI efforts can be developed. One approach in particular, the bias habit-breaking training, has 15 years of experimental evidence demonstrating its widespread effectiveness and efficacy. Design/methodology/approach –: This article discusses bias, diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) efforts from the author's perspective as a scientist-practitioner - the author draws primarily on the scientific literature, but also integrates insights from practical experiences working in DEI. The author provides a roadmap for adapting effective, evidence-based approaches from other disciplines (e.g. cognitive-behavioral therapy) into the DEI context and reviews evidence related to the bias habit-breaking training as one prominent demonstration of a scientifically-validated approach that effects lasting, meaningful improvements on DEI issues within both individuals and institutions. Findings –: DEI trainings fail due to widespread adoption of the information deficit model, which is well-known as a highly ineffective approach. Empowerment-based approaches, in contrast, are highly promising for making meaningful, lasting changes in the DEI realm. Evidence indicates that the bias habit-breaking training is effective at empowering individuals as agents of change to reduce bias, create inclusion, and promote equity, both within themselves and the social contexts they inhabit. Originality/value –: In contrast to the considerable despair and pessimism around DEI efforts, the present analysis provides hope and optimism, and an empirically-validated path forward, to develop and test DEI approaches that empower individuals as agents of change.

Indexed as

BiasDEIDiversityEquityTrainingUnconscious bias

Identifiers

PMID37090785
PMCPMC10120861

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.