Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37090673›Full record

ArticlebioRxiv : the preprint server for biology2023

Driving and suppressing the human language network using large language models.

Greta Tuckute, Aalok Sathe, Shashank Srikant, Maya Taliaferro, Mingye Wang, Martin Schrimpf, Kendrick Kay, Evelina Fedorenko

Open access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 23 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.

Greta TuckuteDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5572-5469
Aalok SatheDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5248-7557
Shashank SrikantComputer Science & Artificial Intelligence Laboratory, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7805-6926
Maya TaliaferroDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-1546
Mingye WangDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.
Martin SchrimpfMcGovern Institute for Brain Research, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-7766-7223
Kendrick KayCenter for Magnetic Resonance Research, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455 USA.ORCID 0000-0001-6604-9155
Evelina FedorenkoDepartment of Brain and Cognitive Sciences, Massachusetts Institute of Technology, Cambridge, MA 02139 USA.ORCID 0000-0003-3823-514X
McGovern Institute for Brain Research · USHarvard University · USIBM (United States) · USUniversity of Minnesota · US

Funding

Computational Neuroscience of Language Processing in the Human BrainU01NS121471 · NINDS · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA, RICHARDSON, ROBERT MARK · 2021 to 2025
$3.2M
Functional reorganization of the language and domain-general multiple demand systems in aphasiaR01DC016950 · NIDCD · BOSTON UNIVERSITY (CHARLES RIVER CAMPUS) · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA, KIRAN, SWATHI · 2019 to 2023
$3.2M
The neural architecture of pragmatic processingR01DC016607 · NIDCD · MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY · PI FEDORENKO, EVELINA · 2018 to 2022
$2.4M
NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016607NIDCD NIH HHS R01 DC016950NINDS NIH HHS U01 NS121471
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Transformer models such as GPT generate human-like language and are highly predictive of human brain responses to language. Here, using fMRI-measured brain responses to 1,000 diverse sentences, we first show that a GPT-based encoding model can predict the magnitude of brain response associated with each sentence. Then, we use the model to identify new sentences that are predicted to drive or suppress responses in the human language network. We show that these model-selected novel sentences indeed strongly drive and suppress activity of human language areas in new individuals. A systematic analysis of the model-selected sentences reveals that surprisal and well-formedness of linguistic input are key determinants of response strength in the language network. These results establish the ability of neural network models to not only mimic human language but also noninvasively control neural activity in higher-level cortical areas, like the language network.

Identifiers

PMID37090673
PMCPMC10120732
OpenAlexW4366003941

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.