Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37090566›Full record

ArticleResearch square2023

Evaluation of a Carepartner-Integrated Telehealth Gait Rehabilitation Program for Persons with Stroke : Study Protocol for a Feasibility Study.

Sarah Blanton, George Cotsonis, Kayla Brenan, Robert Song, Laura Zajac-Cox, Sarah Caston, Heather Stewart, Arun Jayaraman, Darcy Reisman, Patricia C Clark and 1 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in Research square, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT05257928 (Evaluation of a Carepartner-Integrated Telehealth Gait Rehabilitation Program for Persons With Stroke), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT05257928 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of a Carepartner-Integrated Telehealth Gait Rehabilitation Program for Persons With Stroke

TypeinterventionalSponsorEmory UniversityRan2022 to 2023Enrolled32ConditionsStrokeArmsCARE-CITE Gait
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 2 countries.

Sarah BlantonEmory University.ORCID 0000-0002-0137-1925
George CotsonisEmory University School of Public Health.
Kayla BrenanEmory University Hospital.
Robert SongEmory University School of Medicine.
Laura Zajac-CoxEmory University School of Medicine.
Sarah CastonEmory University School of Medicine.
Heather StewartEmory University Hospital.
Arun JayaramanNorthwestern University Department of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation.
Darcy ReismanUniversity of Delaware Department of Physical Therapy.
Patricia C ClarkGeorgia State University Byrdine F Lewis School of Nursing and Health Professions.
Trisha KesarEmory University School of Medicine.
Emory University · USEmory University Hospital · USGeorgia State University · USNorthwestern University · PHUniversity of Delaware · US

Funding

Institute for Clinical and Translational ResearchUL1TR000424 · NCATS · JOHNS HOPKINS UNIVERSITY · PI FORD, DANIEL ERNEST · 2012 to 2012
$6.0M
NCATS NIH HHS UL1 TR000424
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Despite family carepartners of individuals post-stroke experiencing high levels of strain and reduced quality of life, stroke rehabilitation interventions rarely address carepartner well-being or offer training to support their engagement in therapeutic activities. Our group has developed creative intervention approaches to support families during stroke recovery, thereby improving physical and psychosocial outcomes for both carepartners and stroke survivors. The purpose of this preliminary clinical trial is to test the feasibility of an adapted, home-based intervention (Carepartner Collaborative Integrative Therapy for Gait-CARE-CITE-Gait) designed to facilitate positive carepartner involvement during home-based training targeting gait and mobility. Methods: This two-phased study will determine the feasibility of CARE-CITE-Gait, a novel intervention developed by our team that leverages principles from our previous carepartner-focused upper extremity intervention. During the 4-week CARE-CITE-Gait intervention, carepartners review online video-based modules designed to illustrate strategies for an autonomy-supportive environment during functional mobility task practice, and the study team completes two 2-hour (home-based) visits for dyad collaborative goal setting. In Phase I, the usability and acceptability of the CARE-CITE-Gait modules will be evaluated by stroke rehabilitation content experts and carepartners. In Phase II, feasibility (based on measures of recruitment, retention, and intervention adherence) will be measured. Preliminary effects of the CARE-CITE-Gait will be gathered using a single-group, evaluator blinded, quasi-experimental design with repeated measures (two baseline visits one week apart, post-test, and one-month follow-up) with 15 carepartner and stroke survivor dyads. Outcomes include psychosocial variables (strain, family conflict surrounding stroke recovery, autonomy support and life changes) collected from carepartners, and measures of functional mobility, gait speed, stepping activity, and health-related quality of life collected from stroke survivors. Discussion: The findings of the feasibility testing and preliminary data on the effects of CARE-CITE-Gait will provide justification and information to guide a future definitive randomized clinical trial. The knowledge gained from this study will enhance our understanding of and aid the development of rehabilitation approaches that address both carepartner and stroke survivor needs during the stroke recovery process. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT05257928. Registered 25 February 2022, https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT05257928.

Indexed as

CaregiverDyadsGaitRehabilitationStrokeTelehealth

Identifiers

PMID37090566
PMCPMC10120785
OpenAlexW4365509463

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.