ArticleComputational and structural biotechnology journal2023
Exploring the variable space of shallow machine learning models for reversed-phase retention time prediction.
Article in Computational and structural biotechnology journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning in Mass Spectrometry-Based Proteomics and Metabolomics.Methods in molecular biology (Clifton, N.J.) · 2027Article
- Recent Advances in Mass Spectrometry-Based Bottom-Up Proteomics.Analytical chemistry · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Peptide retention time (RT) prediction algorithms are tools to study and identify the physicochemical properties that drive the peptide-sorbent interaction. Traditional RT algorithms use multiple linear regression with manually curated parameters to determine the degree of direct contribution for each parameter and improvements to RT prediction accuracies relied on superior feature engineering. Deep learning led to a significant increase in RT prediction accuracy and automated feature engineering via chaining multiple learning modules. However, the significance and the identity of these extracted variables are not well understood due to the inherent complexity when interpreting "relationships-of-relationships" found in deep learning variables. To achieve both accuracy and interpretability simultaneously, we isolated individual modules used in deep learning and the isolated modules are the shallow learners employed for RT prediction in this work. Using a shallow convolutional neural network (CNN) and gated recurrent unit (GRU), we find that the spatial features obtained via the CNN correlate with real-world physicochemical properties namely cross-collisional sections (CCS) and variations of assessable surface area (ASA). Furthermore, we determined that the discovered parameters are "micro-coefficients" that contribute to the "macro-coefficient" - hydrophobicity. Manually embedding CCS and the variations of ASA to the GRU model yielded an R2 = 0.981 using only 525 variables and can represent 88% of the ∼110,000 tryptic peptides used in our dataset. This work highlights the feature discovery process of our shallow learners can achieve beyond traditional RT models in performance and have better interpretability when compared with the deep learning RT algorithms found in the literature.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.