ArticleCureus2023
Surgical Management of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: The Treatment Algorithm and Outcome.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Comparative efficacy of contralateral versus ipsilateral open-door laminoplasty for cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2026Pooled it
- The relationship between OPLL and metabolic disorders.Bone research · 2025Review
- Novel Algorithm for Surgical Management of Cervical Ossification of Posterior Longitudinal Ligament: A Retrospective Cohort Study With 2-Year Follow-Up.Orthopaedic surgery · 2025Article
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction Managing patients who present with symptoms of cervical myelopathy secondary to cervical ossification of the posterior longitudinal ligament (OPLL) is challenging. Various factors such as the number of levels involved with OPLL, types of OPLL, canal occupying ratio, K-line characteristics, and C2-C7 lordosis angle were found to guide decision-making and surgical approaches in managing this condition. However, no clear treatment algorithm has been published. This study aims to investigate the outcome of the management of cervical OPLL using a treatment algorithm used in a tertiary university hospital. Methods This is a retrospective cross-sectional study. Patients with cervical myelopathy secondary to cervical OPLL who were treated surgically in our center from 2014 to 2020 were included in this study. Demographic data and preoperative parameters that determined the treatment given according to our treatment algorithm were analyzed. Result A total of 24 patients fit the inclusion and exclusion criteria of the study. The mean recovery rate for all groups is 61.8[Formula: see text]21.9% and the mean postoperative neck disability index (NDI) is 17.83[Formula: see text]16.67%. There was a statistically significant difference between preoperative and postoperative Japanese Orthopaedic Association (JOA) scores for both anterior and posterior surgery subgroups. Conclusion We believe that the treatment algorithm used in our center could benefit other surgeons as a guide in managing patients who suffer from cervical myelopathy secondary to cervical OPLL. Further study including newer techniques would increase the surgeon's arsenal in providing the best outcome in managing this condition.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.