ReviewCureus2023
Nasal Packing in Septal Surgery: A Narrative Review.
Review in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07745127 (Trans Septal Suture Technique Verses Anterior Nasal Packing After Septoplasty - A Comparative Study), which is not on this map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Trans Septal Suture Technique Verses Anterior Nasal Packing After Septoplasty - A Comparative Study
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.
- Clinical utility of additional non-absorbable nasal packing after septoplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2026Review
- Article
- Review
- Comparing Nasal Splints and Quilting Sutures in Septoplasty: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2025Article
- An Analysis of the VELNEZ Nasal Pack's Acceptability and Safety for Use During Nasal Surgery: A Prospective Study.Indian journal of otolaryngology and head and neck surgery : official publication of the Association of Otolaryngologists of India · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Recently, alternatives to intranasal packing following septoplasty and rhinoseptoplasty have been widely used and promoted. Here, we aimed to systemically review and compare the different types of nasal packing used in these two surgeries. To assess patient comfort and surgical outcomes, we conducted a comprehensive search of multiple databases such as PubMed, MEDLINE, Web of Science, and Google Scholar to identify and evaluate relevant articles. A detailed and extensive search was performed with the help of the keywords "nasal packing," "septoplasty," "rhinoseptoplasty," "nasal splints," and "intranasal packing." Overall, our review findings indicate that alternative methods (e.g., trans-septal suturing and insertion of intranasal splints) are better options than intranasal packing.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.