ArticleCureus2023
Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy Planning for Craniospinal Irradiation With a New O-ring Linac.
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
- Craniospinal irradiation planning and delivery: a comparison between Halcyon Ring Gantry and TrueBeam C Arm LINAC delivery systems.Reports of practical oncology and radiotherapy : journal of Greatpoland Cancer Center in Poznan and Polish Society of Radiation Oncology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
This study aims to determine the feasibility of using a new O-ring linear accelerator (Halcyon, Varian Medical Systems, CA, USA) to perform treatment planning using volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) for craniospinal irradiation (CSI). A 20-year-old male patient with leukemia was selected. The planning target volume (PTV) was contoured to include the entire contents of the brain and spinal canal. The PTV margin was 10 mm applied to the clinical target volume (CTV). VMAT (RapidArc, Varian Medical Systems, CA, USA) planning was performed using four isocenter with five arcs, two full rotation arcs to cover the brain and upper part of the spinal cord, and one full rotation arc for the lower part of the spinal cord. The plan was created using the auto-feathering photon optimizer calculation of the planning system. The conformity index (CI) and heterogeneity index (HI) as well as dose-volume histograms of organs at risk (OAR) were evaluated. The patient position of ±3.0 mm in the craniocaudal direction was moved in to simulate the effect of treatment inaccuracy. The total treatment time was also measured. The CI and HI were 1.09 and 8.44, respectively. The mean dose (PTV) was 105.5%, and the mean dose (OARs) was lower than the planning dose constraints. Simulations with a patient position shift of ±3.0 mm resulted in an error of less than ±10.0% of the planned dose to the spinal cord. The total treatment time was within 15 minutes. VMAT planning for CSI with Halcyon achieved high conformality, uniform dose distribution, low dose to the surrounding normal tissues, and reduced treatment time.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.