ArticleCureus2023
Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS).
Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to its rarity, literature pertaining to radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (RAS) remains sparse, with most studies focusing on retrospective review. Of more significant concern is the ambiguity of screening recommendations and modalities used to detect RAS, with current guidelines focusing on yearly mammographic imaging for women who underwent lumpectomy with radiation. Unfortunately, routine post-cancer screening has demonstrated low sensitivity in detecting RAS, often mistaking it for benign changes in roughly half of cases. We present an 83-year-old woman initially diagnosed with stage 1 invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast who underwent a lumpectomy followed by radiation with 6040 cGy. Five years after her initial diagnosis, the patient noticed a suspicious lesion which then led her to undergo multiple modalities of imaging that described benign features. After continued concern, a biopsy was taken that demonstrated RAS of the left breast within the irradiated site. The patient underwent further radiation and declined surgical intervention. Routine screening with mammography and ultrasonography following breast radiation treatment are not sensitive modalities in detecting RAS. High-risk patient groups treated with greater than 0.5 Gy of radiation with concerning physical features 2-10 years after treatment should undergo MRI with biopsy at the initial concern to rule out angiosarcoma. Benign findings on imaging with patients in these groups should also consider biopsy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.