Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37090301›Full record

ArticleCureus2023

Low Radiologic Sensitivity in Detecting Radiation-Associated Breast Angiosarcoma (RAS).

Jonathan Fakhry, Mariam Hanna

Open access · diamondAbstract readCase Reports
In one paragraph

Article in Cureus, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact, top 97% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Jonathan FakhryBreast Imaging, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
Mariam HannaBreast Imaging, University of Florida College of Medicine, Gainesville, USA.
University of Florida · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Due to its rarity, literature pertaining to radiation-associated breast angiosarcoma (RAS) remains sparse, with most studies focusing on retrospective review. Of more significant concern is the ambiguity of screening recommendations and modalities used to detect RAS, with current guidelines focusing on yearly mammographic imaging for women who underwent lumpectomy with radiation. Unfortunately, routine post-cancer screening has demonstrated low sensitivity in detecting RAS, often mistaking it for benign changes in roughly half of cases. We present an 83-year-old woman initially diagnosed with stage 1 invasive ductal carcinoma of the left breast who underwent a lumpectomy followed by radiation with 6040 cGy. Five years after her initial diagnosis, the patient noticed a suspicious lesion which then led her to undergo multiple modalities of imaging that described benign features. After continued concern, a biopsy was taken that demonstrated RAS of the left breast within the irradiated site. The patient underwent further radiation and declined surgical intervention. Routine screening with mammography and ultrasonography following breast radiation treatment are not sensitive modalities in detecting RAS. High-risk patient groups treated with greater than 0.5 Gy of radiation with concerning physical features 2-10 years after treatment should undergo MRI with biopsy at the initial concern to rule out angiosarcoma. Benign findings on imaging with patients in these groups should also consider biopsy.

Indexed as

breast cancer screeninginvasive ductal carcinomalumpectomyradiation therapysecondary breast angiosarcoma

Identifiers

PMID37090301
PMCPMC10119970
OpenAlexW4353089843

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.