Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37090167›Full record

ReviewACS energy letters2023

Electrode Separators for the Next-Generation Alkaline Water Electrolyzers.

David Aili, Mikkel Rykær Kraglund, Sinu C Rajappan, Dmytro Serhiichuk, Yifan Xia, Valadoula Deimede, Joannis Kallitsis, Chulsung Bae, Patric Jannasch, Dirk Henkensmeier and 1 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in ACS energy letters, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
12.2field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 94 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Use of Poly(styrene-ACS polymers Au · 2026
    Article
  5. Application of PVA Membrane Doped with TiONanomaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  6. Article
  7. Enhanced OHMembranes · 2025
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 5 institutions in 6 countries.

David AiliDepartment of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej, Building 375, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3510-135X
Mikkel Rykær KraglundDepartment of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej, Building 375, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1229-1007
Sinu C RajappanDepartment of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej, Building 375, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5123-8391
Dmytro SerhiichukDepartment of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej, Building 375, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5516-5932
Yifan XiaDepartment of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej, Building 375, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7388-2273
Valadoula DeimedeDepartment of Chemistry, University of Patras, 26504, Patras, Greece.
Joannis KallitsisDepartment of Chemistry, University of Patras, 26504, Patras, Greece.
Chulsung BaeDepartment of Chemistry and Chemical Biology, Rensselaer Polytechnic Institute, Troy, New York 12180, United States.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9026-3319
Patric JannaschPolymer & Materials Chemistry, Department of Chemistry, Lund University, 221 00 Lund, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9649-7781
Dirk HenkensmeierHydrogen·Fuel Cell Research Center, Korea Institute of Science andTechnology, Seoul 02792, Republic of Korea.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2330-953X
Jens Oluf JensenDepartment of Energy Conversion and Storage, Technical University of Denmark, Elektrovej, Building 375, 2800 Lyngby, Denmark.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2427-7763
Technical University of Denmark · DKUniversity of Patras · GRKorea University · KRLund University · SERensselaer Polytechnic Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Multi-gigawatt-scale hydrogen production by water electrolysis is central in the green transition when it comes to storage of energy and forming the basis for sustainable fuels and materials. Alkaline water electrolysis plays a key role in this context, as the scale of implementation is not limited by the availability of scarce and expensive raw materials. Even though it is a mature technology, the new technological context of the renewable energy system demands more from the systems in terms of higher energy efficiency, enhanced rate capability, as well as dynamic, part-load, and differential pressure operation capability. New electrode separators that can support high currents at small ohmic losses, while effectively suppressing gas crossover, are essential to achieving this. This Focus Review compares the three main development paths that are currently being pursued in the field with the aim to identify the advantages and drawbacks of the different approaches in order to illuminate rational ways forward.

Identifiers

PMID37090167
PMCPMC10111418
OpenAlexW4361003399

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.