Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37090101›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2023

Impact of Performance Status on Survival Outcomes and Health Care Utilization in Patients With Advanced NSCLC Treated With Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors.

Daniel E Meyers, Meghann Pasternak, Samantha Dolter, Heidi A I Grosjean, Chloe A Lim, Igor Stukalin, Siddhartha Goutam, Vishal Navani, Daniel Y C Heng, Winson Y Cheung and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 33 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
33citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

33 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Impact of disease status and general condition on changes in physical function before and after allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Review
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Daniel E MeyersDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Meghann PasternakDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Samantha DolterDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Heidi A I GrosjeanDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Chloe A LimDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Igor StukalinDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Siddhartha GoutamFaculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Alberta, Canada.
Vishal NavaniDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Daniel Y C HengDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Winson Y CheungDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Don G MorrisDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.
Aliyah PabaniDepartment of Oncology, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Landmark trials testing immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) in advanced NSCLC are difficult to extrapolate to real-world practice given the exclusion of patients with poor (i.e., ≥2) Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (ECOG PS). We sought to evaluate the impact of ECOG PS on clinical outcomes and health care utilization in patients with NSCLC treated with ICIs in real-world practice. Methods: Patients with advanced NSCLC who received at least one dose of pembrolizumab or nivolumab were retrospectively identified from the Alberta Immunotherapy Database. The primary outcome was median overall survival, as stratified by ECOG PS. Secondary outcomes included median time-to-treatment failure and metrics of health care utilization, including emergency department visits, hospitalizations, and death in hospital. Results: A total of 790 patients were included, with 29.2% having poor ECOG PS at initiation of ICI. These patients had significantly lower median overall survival (3.3 versus 13.4 mo) and median time-to-treatment failure (1.4 versus 4.9 mo) compared with those with favorable ECOG PS ( Conclusions: Patients with NSCLC with poor ECOG PS treated with ICI had significantly worse survival outcomes and were significantly more likely to use health care services than those with favorable ECOG PS. The large proportion of patients with poor ECOG PS further justifies the urgent need for randomized trials evaluating the efficacy of ICI in this high-risk population.

Indexed as

ECOG PSImmune checkpoint inhibitorsNon–small lung cancerPoor performance statusSurvival in poor ECOG

Identifiers

PMID37090101
PMCPMC10120368

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.