Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37090100›Full record

ArticleJTO clinical and research reports2023

Biopsy Method and Needle Size on Success of Next-Generation Sequencing in NSCLC: A Brief Report.

Raymond Diep, Madeline MacDonald, Ryan Cooper, Anna Grzegorczyk, Rastko Rakocevic, Ching-Fei Chang, Angeline Uy, Nicholas Cowgill, Jorge J Nieva

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JTO clinical and research reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed
3.6field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Liquid biopsy in lung cancer.Breathe (Sheffield, England) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Raymond DiepCalifornia University of Science and Medicine School of Medicine, Colton, California.
Madeline MacDonaldNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Ryan CooperKeck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Anna GrzegorczykDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Rastko RakocevicDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Ching-Fei ChangDivision of Pulmonary and Critical Care, Keck School of Medicine, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
Angeline UyCaris Life Sciences, Phoenix, Arizona.
Nicholas CowgillCaris Life Sciences, Phoenix, Arizona.
Jorge J NievaNorris Comprehensive Cancer Center, University of Southern California, Los Angeles, California.
University of Southern California · USCaris Life Sciences (United States) · USUniversity of California System · US

Funding

USC/CHLA Summer Oncology Research Fellowship (SORF) Program for Medical StudentsR25CA225513 · NCI · CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES · PI ANAT ERDREICH-EPSTEIN, WIJBE MARTIN KAST · 2019 to 2026
$1.7M
NCI NIH HHS R25 CA225513
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) is essential to the care of patients with NSCLC. Nevertheless, NGS is dependent on adequate material from biopsy. We evaluated the impact of biopsy method and needle gauge necessary for optimizing success in tissue NGS. Methods: A total of 1660 formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded samples were submitted to Caris Life Sciences from 2007 to 2022 for tumor profiling. The results of NGS assays were linked with retrospective biopsy data for patients with lung cancer treated at USC/Norris Cancer Center to create a database with the following parameters: demographics, biopsy method, tumor location (lung mass versus lymph node versus metastasis), needle gauge, number of needle passes, complications, tumor volume, DNA content, and status of NGS. Fisher's exact test and analysis of variance were performed to determine the impact of biopsy method and needle gauge (G). Results: In total, 77 computed tomography (CT)-guided transthoracic core needle (CT-TTCN) biopsies, 74 endobronchial ultrasound (EBUS)-guided transbronchial needle aspirations (TBNAs), 27 bronchial forceps biopsies, and 107 surgical resections were included. Furthermore, 41 of 77 CT-TTCN biopsies (53.2%), 43 of 74 EBUS-TBNAs (58.1%), 22 of 27 bronchial forceps biopsies (81.5%), and 105 of 107 surgical resections (98.1%) underwent successful NGS assays. The probability of successful NGS completion for lung cancers was highest in surgical resections and bronchial forceps biopsies. Needle-based biopsies were more successful when a needle larger than 20G was used. Complication rates were higher for CT-TTCN biopsies compared with EBUS-TBNA ( Conclusions: The less invasive EBUS-TBNAs had higher success rates in NGS than CT-TTCN biopsies and resulted in higher DNA concentrations. In CT-TTCN biopsies, use of 20G or smaller needles is associated with a higher risk of obtaining an inadequate specimen regardless of the number of passes taken. Surgical and bronchial forceps biopsies had highest success in achieving NGS.

Indexed as

Biopsy methodFine-needle aspirationNeedle gaugeNext-generation sequencing (NGS)Non–small cell lung cancer (NSCLC)Transthoracic core needle biopsy

Identifiers

PMID37090100
PMCPMC10119792
OpenAlexW4323923067

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.