ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Europe2023
Treatment gaps in the implementation of LDL cholesterol control among high- and very high-risk patients in Europe between 2020 and 2021: the multinational observational SANTORINI study.
Article in The Lancet regional health. Europe, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to 2 registered trials, which are not on this map. Cited by 189 papers, 7 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Treatment of High and Very High riSk Dyslipidemic pAtients for the PreveNTion of CardiOvasculaR Events in Europe - a MultInatioNal ObservatIonal Study (SANTORINI)
Educational Intervention for Patient's Awareness on eaRly LDL-C Lowering Using Novel Pharmacological Strategies in secondarY Prevention (EARLY)
Who cites it
189 citing papers in PubMed, 7 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.
- Efficacy and Safety of Enlicitide in Hypercholesterolemia: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2026Pooled it
- Effect of non-statin Therapy on the Composition and Characteristics of Carotid Atherosclerotic Plaques: A Systematic Review.Current neurology and neuroscience reports · 2026Pooled it
- Lipid-Lowering Efficacy and Safety of Oral Proprotein Convertase Subtilisin/Kexin Type 9 Inhibitors: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Advances in therapy · 2026Pooled it
- Adherence to Lipid-Lowering Therapies and Cardiovascular Outcomes in Patients With Atherosclerotic Cardiovascular Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2025 · on this mapPooled it
- Safety and Efficacy of Inclisiran in Hyperlipidemia: An Updated Meta-Analysis of Randomised Controlled Trials.Endocrinology, diabetes & metabolism · 2025Pooled it
- Benefits of intensive lipid-lowering therapies in patients with acute coronary syndrome: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Annals of medicine · 2024Pooled it
- Guideline
- Efficacy and Safety of Bempedoic Acid in Patients Aged ≥75 Years Stratified by Varying Statin Exposure: Results From Phase 3 Studies of Bempedoic Acid.Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026 · on this mapTrial
- Effectiveness and Safety of Bempedoic Acid in Taiwanese Patients With Hypercholesterolemia: A Pragmatic Phase 4 Study (CLEAR Taiwan Study).Journal of the American Heart Association · 2026Trial
- Obicetrapib in patients with heterozygous familial hypercholesterolemia: the BROOKLYN randomized clinical trial.Nature medicine · 2026Trial
- Real-world cardiovascular risk estimation, blood pressure and LDL-cholesterol control: Two epidemiological studies in Romania, during pandemic and post-pandemic (SNAPSHOT-Romania).Atherosclerosis plus · 2026Article
- Scaling a Lipid-Lowering Clinical Decision Support Intervention Across U.S. Health Systems: Lessons Learned from the PROMPT-LIPID Multicenter Study.American journal of preventive cardiology · 2026Article
- Changes in LDL-C levels among primary health care patients with hypertension, coronary artery disease, and diabetes during a 36-month follow-up.Scandinavian journal of primary health care · 2026Article
- Long-term LDL-C lowering and treatment persistence with inclisiran: 3-year follow-up from the German Inclisiran Network.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Article
- The 2026 ACC/AHA Dyslipidemia Guideline: A Critical and Transatlantic Perspective on Personalized Lipid Management.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Gaps in lipid management among high-risk patients without prior MI or stroke: the VESALIUS-REAL global study.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2026Article
- Sex differences and gender-related factors in the management and perception of LDL-cholesterol in ASCVD: Real-Life evidence from the EPHESUS registry in cardiology practice.Atherosclerosis plus · 2026Article
- LDL-cholesterol distance to target: A practical tool for guiding lipid-lowering treatment decisions.Atherosclerosis plus · 2026Review
- Development of a hybrid artificial intelligence framework for pharmacotherapy optimization.International journal of clinical pharmacy · 2026Article
129 more citing papers are in PubMed but not listed here.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
19 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: European data pre-2019 suggest statin monotherapy is the most common approach to lipid management for preventing cardiovascular (CV) events, resulting in only one-fifth of high- and very high-risk patients achieving the 2019 ESC/EAS recommended low-density lipoprotein cholesterol (LDL-C) goals. Whether the treatment landscape has evolved, or gaps persist remains of interest. Methods: Baseline data are presented from SANTORINI, an observational, prospective study that documents the use of lipid-lowering therapies (LLTs) in patients ≥18 years at high or very high CV risk between 2020 and 2021 across primary and secondary care settings in 14 European countries. Findings: Of 9602 enrolled patients, 9044 with complete data were included (mean age: 65.3 ± 10.9 years; 72.6% male). Physicians reported using 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines as a basis for CV risk classification in 52.0% (4706/9044) of patients (overall: high risk 29.2%; very high risk 70.8%). However, centrally re-assessed CV risk based on 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines suggested 6.5% (308/4706) and 91.0% (4284/4706) were high- and very high-risk patients, respectively. Overall, 21.8% of patients had no documented LLTs, 54.2% were receiving monotherapy and 24.0% combination LLT. Median (interquartile range [IQR]) LDL-C was 2.1 (1.6, 3.0) mmol/L (82 [60, 117] mg/dL), with 20.1% of patients achieving risk-based LDL-C goals as per the 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines. Interpretation: At the time of study enrolment, 80% of high- and very high-risk patients failed to achieve 2019 ESC/EAS guidelines LDL-C goals. Contributory factors may include CV risk underestimation and underutilization of combination therapies. Further efforts are needed to achieve current guideline-recommended LDL-C goals. Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04271280. Funding: This study is funded by Daiichi Sankyo Europe GmbH, Munich, Germany.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.