Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37090057›Full record

ArticleEuropean heart journal open2023

Moving toward gender equity in the cardiology and cardiovascular research workforce in Germany: a report from the German Cardiac Society.

Carolin Lerchenmüller, Laura Zelarayan, Katrin Streckfuss-Bömeke, Maria Rubini Gimenez, Renate Schnabel, Djawid Hashemi, Stephan Baldus, Tanja K Rudolph, Caroline Morbach

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European heart journal open, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. ​Consideration of sex/gender aspects in cardiovascular clinical trials.Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. [Compatibility of family and cardiac electrophysiology].Herzschrittmachertherapie & Elektrophysiologie · 2025
    Article
  4. Review
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Carolin LerchenmüllerDepartment of Cardiology, Angiology, Pulmonology, University Hospital Heidelberg, INF 410, 69120 Heidelberg, Germany.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5620-0285
Laura ZelarayanInstitute of Pharmacology and Toxicology, University Medical Center Goettingen, Georg-August University, Robert-Koch-Straße 40, 37075 Göttingen, Germany.
Katrin Streckfuss-BömekeDZHK (German Center for Heart and Cardiovascular Research), partner site Goettingen, Robert-Koch-Straße 40 37075, Göttingen, Germany.
Maria Rubini GimenezLeipzig Heart Institute, Strümpellstraße 39, 04289 Leipzig, Germany.
Renate SchnabelDepartment of Cardiology, University Heart and Vascular Center Hamburg, Martinistr. 52, 20246 Hamburg, Germany.
Djawid HashemiDepartment of Internal Medicine and Cardiology, Charité Universitätsmedizin Berlin, corporate member of Freie Universität Berlin and Humboldt Universität zu Berlin, Augustenburger Platz 11, 3353 Berlin, Germany.
Stephan BaldusDepartment of General and Interventional Cardiology, Electrophysiology, Angiology, Pulmonology and Intensive Care, Heart Center, University of Cologne, Kerpener Str. 62, 50937 Köln, Germany.
Tanja K RudolphDepartment for General and Interventional Cardiology/Angiology, Heart and Diabetes Center North Rhine-Westphalia, University Hospital of the Ruhr-University Bochum, Georgstr. 11, 32545 Bad Oeynhausen, Germany.
Caroline MorbachDepartment Internal Medicine I, University Hospital Wuerzburg, Am Schwarzenberg 15, 97078 Würzburg, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Aims: Although the share of women in cardiology in Germany is growing steadily, this does not translate into leadership positions. Medical societies play a crucial role in shaping the national and international medical and scientific environment. The German Cardiac Society (DGK) aims to serve the public discourse on gender-equity by systematic analysis of data on gender representation within the society and in Germany. Methods and results: We present gender disaggregated data collection of members, official organs, working groups, scientific meetings, as well as awards of the DGK based on anonymized exports from the DGK office as well as on data gathered from the DGK web page. From 2000 to 2020, the overall number of DGK members as well as the share of women increased (12.5% to 25.3%). In 2021, the share of women ranged from 40% to 50% in earlier career stages but was substantially lower at senior levels (23.9% of consulting/attending physicians, 7.1% of physicians-in-chief, 3.4% of directors). The share of women serving in DGK working groups had gained overall proportionality, but nuclei and speaker positions were largely held by men. Boards and project groups were predominantly represented by men as well. At the DGK-led scientific meetings, women contributed more often in junior relative to (invited) senior roles. Conclusion: Increasing numbers of women in cardiology and in the DGK over the past 20 years did not translate into the respective increase in representation of women in leadership positions. There is an urgent need to identify and, more importantly, to overcome barriers towards gender equity. Transparent presentation of society-related data is the first step for future targeted actions in this regard.

Indexed as

Academic medicineCardiology workforceEquityGender

Identifiers

PMID37090057
PMCPMC10114529

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.