ReviewAnnals of translational medicine2023
Evolution in anti-myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein antibody detection and its clinical significance: a narrative review.
Review in Annals of translational medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Diagnostic performance of MALDI-TOF MS for non-tuberculous mycobacteria: A systematic review and meta-analysis.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2026Pooled it
- The Elusive B Cell Antigen in Multiple Sclerosis: Time to Rethink CNS B Cell Functions.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Pooled it
- Case Report: Overlap syndrome of anti-NMDA receptor encephalitis and MOG-associated disease in a pediatric patient-literature insights.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Mechanism of action and new developments in the study of curcumin in the treatment of osteoarthritis: a narrative review.Inflammopharmacology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG) is a protein exclusively expressing on the surface of myelin sheaths and oligodendrocyte plasma membrane in the central nervous system of mammals, and it has a highly conserved nucleotide and amino acid structure between species. Evidence from animal research support that anti-MOG antibodies (MOG-Abs) are pathogenic antibodies rather than a bystander secondary to myelin destruction. Similarly, immunoglobulin-G against myelin oligodendrocyte glycoprotein (MOG-IgG) is considered a demyelinating disease-associated autoantibody in human beings. In clinical studies, several detection methods, including ELISA, immunoblot, radio immunoprecipitation assays and Cell-based assays (CBAs), have been applied in identifying MOG-Abs in idiopathic inflammatory demyelinating diseases (IIDDs) of human beings. CBAs method is recommended by many proposed diagnostic criterions for MOG-Abs-associated disorders (MOGAD). This method involves transfection of mammalian cells with MOG antigen, binding of MOG-Abs to MOG antigen, binding of secondary antibodies to MOG-Abs and quantification method. However, the reliability for CBAs systems of MOG-Abs detection can be influenced by numerous factors, such as length of MOG antigen, expression vectors, cell lines, secondary antibodies, and read-out systems. In addition, there are controversial results on the studies of IIDDs with MOG-IgG positive. Nowadays, more and more evidence suggests that patients positive for MOG-IgG share common features, but further clinical and laboratory researches are needed to clarify if MOGAD is an independent disease entity. In this review, we intend to summarize the detection methods of MOG-Abs and their sensitivity and specificity to MOGAD in human.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.