ArticleRegenerative therapy2023
Modified gelatin hydrogel nonwoven fabrics (Genocel) as a skin substitute in murine skin defects.
Article in Regenerative therapy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.
- Self-assembling multilayer MSC-sheet promotes wound healing increasing M2 macrophage polarization.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- A Novel Peptide-Anchoring Method to Functionalize Gelatin Hydrogels with Antibodies via a Noncovalent Interaction.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Potential of gelatin hydrogel nonwoven fabrics (Genocel) as a skin substitute in a diabetic mouse skin defect model.Regenerative therapy · 2024Article
- Identification of the growth cone as a probe and driver of neuronal migration in the injured brain.Nature communications · 2024Article
- Effect of Gelatin-Based Hemostats on Fibroblasts and Relevant Growth Factors in Wound Healing.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Introduction: From previous research, an emerging material composed of gelatin hydrogel nonwoven fabric (Genocel) has shown potential as a skin substitute, by improving neovascularization promotion in the early phase of wound healing. However, Genocel was inferior in terms of granulation formation compared to Pelnac. To solve this problem, we modified the manufacturing process of Genocel to reduce its water content, extend the degradation time (Genocel-L), and evaluate its healing process as a skin substitute. Methods: Genocel with a low water content (Genocel-L) was prepared and the difference in water content compared to that of the conventional Genocel was confirmed. Degradation tests were performed using collagenase and compared among Genocel-L, Genocel, and Pelnac sheets. In the in vivo study, sheets of Genocel-L or Pelnac were applied to skin defects created on the backs of C57BL/6JJcl mice. On days 7, 14, and 21, the remaining wound area was evaluated and specimens were harvested for Hematoxylin and Eosin, Azan, anti-CD31, CD68, and CD163 staining to assess neoepithelialization, granulation tissue, capillary formation, and macrophage infiltration. Results: Genocel-L had a lower water content than the conventional Genocel and a slower degradation than Genocel and Pelnac. In the in vivo experiment, no significant differences were observed between Genocel-L and Pelnac in relation to the wound area, neoepithelium length, granulation formation, and the number of newly formed capillaries. The area of newly formed capillaries in the Pelnac group was significantly larger than that in the Genocel-L group on day 21 (p < 0.05). Regarding macrophage infiltration, significantly more M2 macrophages were induced in the Pelnac group on days 14 and 21, and the M2 ratio was larger in the Pelnac group (p < 0.05) during the entire process. Conclusions: Genocel-L has a lower water content and slower degradation rate than the conventional Genocel. Genocel-L had equivalent efficacy as a skin substitute to Pelnac, and can therefore be considered feasible for use as a skin substitute. However, a manufacturing method that can further modify Genocel-L is required to recover its early angiogenic potential.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.