ArticleRadiology case reports2023
Epithelioid myofibroblastoma with concurrent presentation of LCIS and DCIS.
Article in Radiology case reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Myofibroblastoma (MFB) of the breast is a rare benign neoplasm of the mammary stroma. Several morphologic variants have been described in the literature, which can create diagnostic challenges for pathologists, in particular the epithelioid variant of MFB, which can mimic invasive lobular carcinoma. We report a case of a 72-year-old female who presented for a painless breast lump and was later found to have 2 lesions on imaging, with 1 lesion corresponding to the palpable lump and the other lying in a different quadrant. Core-needle biopsies demonstrated ductal carcinoma in-situ at both lesional sites with what was originally felt to be an invasive lobular carcinoma at the lesional site which did not correspond to the palpable lump. After mastectomy, with more complete visualization microscopically of the lesional area originally felt to be an invasive lobular carcinoma, the final pathology was consistent with a MFB, predominantly epithelioid variant, in addition to ductal carcinoma in-situ and lobular carcinoma in-situ. In this paper we describe the imaging findings of an epithelioid MFB and how its nonspecific nature necessitates close communication between the radiologist and pathologist to make the correct diagnosis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.