Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37089906›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2023

Accuracy of deformable image registration-based intra-fraction motion management in Magnetic Resonance-guided radiotherapy.

Miguel A Palacios, Georgi Gerganov, Paul Cobussen, Shyama U Tetar, Tobias Finazzi, Berend J Slotman, Suresh Senan, Cornelis J A Haasbeek, Iwan Kawrakow

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
3.9field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 11 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Miguel A PalaciosAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Georgi GerganovViewray Inc, 2 Thermo Fischer Way, Oakwood Village, OH 44146, USA.
Paul CobussenAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Shyama U TetarAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Tobias FinazziAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Berend J SlotmanAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Suresh SenanAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Cornelis J A HaasbeekAmsterdam UMC, Vrije Universiteit Medical Centre, Dept. of Radiation Oncology, de Boelelaan 1117, 1081 HV Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Iwan KawrakowViewray Inc, 2 Thermo Fischer Way, Oakwood Village, OH 44146, USA.
Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLViewRay (United States) · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Purpose: Intra-fraction motion management is key in Stereotactic Ablative Radiotherapy (SABR) gated delivery. This study assessed the accuracy of automatic tumor segmentation in the delivery of MR-guided radiotherapy (MRgRT) by comparing it to manual delineations performed by experienced observers. Materials and Methods: Twenty patients previously treated with MR-guided SABR for thoracic and abdominal tumors were included. Five observers with at least two years of experience in MRgRT manually delineated the gross tumor volume (GTV) for 20 patients on 240 frames of a cine MRI on a sagittal plane. Deformable Image Registration (DIR) based GTV contours were propagated using four different algorithms from a reference frame to subsequent frames.Geometrical analysis based on the Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), centroid distance and Hausdorff Distance (HDD) were performed to assess the inter-observer variability and the accuracy of automatic segmentation. A Confidence Value (CV) metric for the reliability of the tumor auto-contouring was also calculated. Results: Inter-observer delineation variability resulted in mean DSC of 0.89, HDD of 5.8 mm and centroid distance of 1.7 mm. Tumor auto-contouring by the four DIR algorithms resulted in an excellent agreement with the manual delineations by the experienced observers. Mean DSC for each algorithm across all patients was greater than 0.90, whereas the HDD and centroid distances were below 4.0 mm and 1.5 mm, respectively. The CV showed a strong correlation with the DSC. Conclusions: DIR-based auto-contouring in MRgRT exhibited a high level of agreement with the manual contouring performed by experts, allowing accurate gated delivery.

Indexed as

AutocontouringIntra-fractionMotion managementMR-guidedReal-time tracking

Identifiers

PMID37089906
PMCPMC10113900
OpenAlexW4362560227

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.