Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37089863›Full record

ArticleCancer research communications2023

Systemic LRG1 Expression in Melanoma is Associated with Disease Progression and Recurrence.

Esmee P Hoefsmit, Franziska Völlmy, Elisa A Rozeman, Irene L M Reijers, Judith M Versluis, Liesbeth Hoekman, Alexander C J van Akkooi, Georgina V Long, Dirk Schadendorf, Reinhard Dummer and 2 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Cancer research communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
3.5field-weighted citation impact, top 7% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 15 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors at 6 institutions in 4 countries.

Esmee P Hoefsmit *Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3989-8175
Franziska Völlmy *Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-0345-1910
Elisa A RozemanDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7063-651X
Irene L M ReijersDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7103-3219
Judith M VersluisDepartment of Medical Oncology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3423-9912
Liesbeth HoekmanProteomics Facility, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-3552-6390
Alexander C J van AkkooiMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0002-3262-6935
Georgina V LongMelanoma Institute Australia, The University of Sydney, Sydney, New South Wales, Australia.ORCID 0000-0001-8894-3545
Dirk SchadendorfDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Essen and Germany Cancer Consortium, Partner Site Essen, Essen, Germany.ORCID 0000-0003-3524-7858
Reinhard DummerDepartment of Dermatology, University Hospital Zürich, University Zürich, Zürich, Switzerland.ORCID 0000-0002-2279-6906
Maarten Altelaar *Biomolecular Mass Spectrometry and Proteomics, Center for Biomolecular Research and Utrecht Institute for Pharmaceutical Sciences, Utrecht University, Utrecht, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-5093-5945
Christian U Blank *Department of Molecular Oncology and Immunology, Netherlands Cancer Institute, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0002-7945-5846
Oncode Institute · NLThe University of Sydney · AUUtrecht University · NLEssen University Hospital · DELeiden University Medical Center · NLUniversity Hospital of Zurich · CH

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The response rates upon neoadjuvant immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) in stage III melanoma are higher as compared with stage IV disease. Given that successful ICB depends on systemic immune response, we hypothesized that systemic immune suppression might be a mechanism responsible for lower response rates in late-stage disease, and also potentially with disease recurrence in early-stage disease. Plasma and serum samples of cohorts of patients with melanoma were analyzed for circulating proteins using mass spectrometry proteomic profiling and Olink proteomic assay. A cohort of paired samples of patients with stage III that progressed to stage IV disease ( Significance: LRG1 could serve as a potential target and as a biomarker to identify patients with high risk for disease recurrence, and consequently benefit from additional therapies and intensive follow-up.

Indexed as

MelanomaProteomicsBiomarkersDisease ProgressionGlycoproteinsHumansPrognosisBiomarkersGlycoproteinsLRG1 protein, human

Identifiers

PMID37089863
PMCPMC10117404
OpenAlexW4353066281

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.