Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37089811›Full record

ReviewRomanian journal of ophthalmology

Using eye-tracking technology in Neuromarketing.

Consuela-Mădălina Gheorghe, Victor Lorin Purcărea, Iuliana-Raluca Gheorghe

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Romanian journal of ophthalmology. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Consuela-Mădălina GheorgheDepartment of Marketing and Medical Technology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Victor Lorin PurcăreaDepartment of Marketing and Medical Technology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.
Iuliana-Raluca GheorgheDepartment of Marketing and Medical Technology, "Carol Davila" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Bucharest, Romania.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The aim of this review is to highlight the importance and benefits of eye tracking in Neuromarketing, by analyzing research papers and articles from international databases such as Scopus, PubMed, Elsevier, Springer and Science Direct. After analyzing some of the most representative publications related to eye tracking in Neuromarketing, we have concluded that it can be considered one of the most important tools in determining the consumers' intent to buy medical products and services. In addition, with a mixture between standard Marketing Research methods and the eye-tracking technology, the researchers can get insight into unconscious factors that influence the consumers' choices and preferences. In conclusion, neuromarketing can prevent the waste of money spent on ineffective marketing campaigns.

Indexed as

Eye-Tracking TechnologyMarketingHumanseye trackinggaze movementsNeuromarketingvisual elements

Identifiers

PMID37089811
PMCPMC10117197

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.