ArticlePattern recognition2023
Quantifying the Preferential Direction of the Model Gradient in Adversarial Training With Projected Gradient Descent.
Article in Pattern recognition, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 19 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Survey of Deep Learning Approaches in Image Processing.Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Adversarial training, especially projected gradient descent (PGD), has proven to be a successful approach for improving robustness against adversarial attacks. After adversarial training, gradients of models with respect to their inputs have a preferential direction. However, the direction of alignment is not mathematically well established, making it difficult to evaluate quantitatively. We propose a novel definition of this direction as the direction of the vector pointing toward the closest point of the support of the closest inaccurate class in decision space. To evaluate the alignment with this direction after adversarial training, we apply a metric that uses generative adversarial networks to produce the smallest residual needed to change the class present in the image. We show that PGD-trained models have a higher alignment than the baseline according to our definition, that our metric presents higher alignment values than a competing metric formulation, and that enforcing this alignment increases the robustness of models.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.