Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37089532›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in microbiology2023

Alteration of pro-carcinogenic gut microbiota is associated with clear cell renal cell carcinoma tumorigenesis.

Bo-Yu Yang, Fang-Zhou Zhao, Xuan-Hao Li, Mei-Shan Zhao, Jing-Cheng Lv, Ming-Jun Shi, Jun Li, Zhi-Yuan Zhou, Jing-Jing Wang, Jian Song

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in microbiology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.5field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Review
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Microbiota and urinary tumor immunity: Mechanisms, therapeutic implications, and future perspectives.Chinese journal of cancer research = Chung-kuo yen cheng yen chiu · 2024
    Article
  7. Review
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. The biotherapeuticGut microbes
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Bo-Yu YangDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Fang-Zhou ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Xuan-Hao LiDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Mei-Shan ZhaoDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing-Cheng LvDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Ming-Jun ShiDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jun LiDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Zhi-Yuan ZhouDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jing-Jing WangShanghai Key Laboratory of Pancreatic Diseases, Institute of Translational Medicine, Shanghai General Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China.
Jian SongDepartment of Urology, Beijing Friendship Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Capital Medical University · CNBeijing Friendship Hospital · CNShanghai Jiao Tong University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Increasing evidence suggests that gut microbiota is involved in the occurrence and progression of urinary system diseases such as clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC). However, the mechanism of how alteration of gut metagenome promotes ccRCC remains unclear. Here we aim to elucidate the association of specific gut bacteria and their metabolites with ccRCC. Methods: In a pilot case-control study among 30 ccRCC patients (RCC group) and 30 healthy controls (Control group), 16S ribosomal RNA (rRNA) gene sequencing were analyzed from fecal samples collected prior to surgery or hospitalization. Alpha diversity and beta diversity analysis of the gut microbiota were performed, and differential taxa were identified by multivariate statistics. Meanwhile, serum metabolism was measured by UHPLC-MS, and differential genes were identified based on the Results: Alpha diversity found there were no significant microbial diversity differences of gut microbiota between the RCC group and the Control group. However, beta diversity analysis showed that the overall structures of the two groups were significantly separated ( Conclusion: Reduction of protective bacteria, proliferation of sulfide-degrading bacteria

Indexed as

16S rRNAclear cell renal cell carcinomagut microbiotainflammationmetabolite

Identifiers

PMID37089532
PMCPMC10113506
OpenAlexW4362625881

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.