Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37089493›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2023

Breast cancer and occupation: Non-parametric and parametric net survival analyses among Swiss women (1990-2014).

Irina Guseva Canu, Nicolas Bovio, Patrick Arveux, Jean-Luc Bulliard, Evelyne Fournier, Simon Germann, Isabelle Konzelmann, Manuela Maspoli, Elisabetta Rapiti, Michel Grzebyk

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
2.3field-weighted citation impact, top 11% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Returning to Work after Breast Cancer: A One-Year Mixed-Methods Study.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2024
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 6 institutions in 2 countries.

Irina Guseva CanuCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Nicolas BovioCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Patrick ArveuxCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Jean-Luc BulliardCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Evelyne FournierGeneva Cancer Registry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Simon GermannCenter for Primary Care and Public Health (Unisanté), University of Lausanne, Lausanne, Switzerland.
Isabelle KonzelmannValais Cancer Registry, Valais Health Observatory, Sion, Switzerland.
Manuela MaspoliNeuchâtel and Jura Cancer Registry, Neuchâtel, Switzerland.
Elisabetta RapitiGeneva Cancer Registry, University of Geneva, Geneva, Switzerland.
Michel GrzebykDepartment of Occupational Epidemiology, National Research and Safety Institute (INRS), Vandoeuvre lès Nancy, France.
University of Lausanne · CHHospital Neuchâtel · CHUniversity of Geneva · CHCentre universitaire de médecine générale et santé publique, Lausanne · CHHES-SO Valais-Wallis · CHInstitut National de Recherche et de Sécurité · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Occupation can contribute to differences in risk and stage at diagnosis of breast cancer. This study aimed at determining whether occupation, along with skill level and the socio-professional category, affect the breast cancer survival (BCS) up to 10 years after diagnosis. Materials and methods: We used cancer registry records to identify women diagnosed with primary invasive breast cancer in western Switzerland over the period 1990-2014 and matched them with the Swiss National Cohort. The effect of work-related variables on BCS was assessed using non-parametric and parametric net survival methods. Results: Study sample included 8,678 women. In the non-parametric analysis, we observed a statistically significant effect of all work-related variables on BCS. Women in elementary occupations, with low skill level, and in paid employment not classified elsewhere, had the lowest BCS, while professionals, those with the highest skill level and belonging to top management and independent profession category had the highest BCS. The parametric analysis confirmed this pattern. Considering elementary occupations as reference, all occupations but Craft and related trades had a hazard ratio (HR) below 1. Among professionals, technicians and associate professionals, and clerks, the protective effect of occupation was statistically significant and remained unchanged after adjustment for age, calendar period, registry, nationality, and histological type. After adjusting for tumor stage, the HRs increased only slightly, though turned non-significant. The same effect was observed in top management and independent professions and supervisors, low level management and skilled laborers, compared to unskilled employees. Conclusion: These results suggest that work-related factors may affect BCS. Yet, this study was conducted using a limited set of covariates and a relatively small study sample. Therefore, further larger studies are needed for more detailed analyses of at risk occupations and working conditions and assessing the potential interaction between work-related variables and tumor stage.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsOccupationsEmploymentFemaleHumansProportional Hazards ModelsRegistriesStatistics, NonparametricSwitzerlandbreast cancercancer registrycohortfemale workeroccupational epidemiologyoccupational exposurereturn to work

Identifiers

PMID37089493
PMCPMC10115164
OpenAlexW4362625974

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.