ArticleEnvironmental research communications2022
Major point and nonpoint sources of nutrient pollution to surface water have declined throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed.
Article in Environmental research communications, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Phosphorus and potentially toxic elements in stream waters, sediments, mine tailings, and pines across Lake Anna watershed, VA, USA, and biochar-lime remediation.Environmental science and pollution research international · 2026Article
- Phosphorus mining and bioavailability for plant acquisition: environmental sustainability perspectives.Environmental monitoring and assessment · 2025Review
- Geography, Trajectories, and Controls of Coastal Water Quality: More Rapid Improvement in the Shallow Zone of the Chesapeake Bay.Environmental science & technology · 2025Article
- Disparities in nitrogen and phosphorus management across time and space: a case study of the Chesapeake Bay using theEnvironmental research letters : ERL [Web site] · 2024Article
- Evaluating water-quality trends in agricultural watersheds prioritized for management-practice implementation.Journal of the American Water Resources Association · 2024Article
- Our national nutrient reduction needs: Applying a conservation prioritization framework to US agricultural lands.Journal of environmental management · 2024Article
- Quantifying seasonal to multi-decadal signals in coastal water quality using high- and low-frequency time series data.Cambridge prisms. Coastal futures · 2024Article
- Effects of point and nonpoint source controls on total phosphorus load trends across the Chesapeake Bay watershed, USA.Environmental research letters : ERL [Web site] · 2023Article
- Comparing Drivers of Spatial Variability in U.S. Lake and Stream Phosphorus Concentrations.Journal of geophysical research. Biogeosciences · 2023Article
- Regional Analysis of Nitrogen Flow within the Chesapeake Bay Watershed Food Production Chain Inclusive of Trade.Environmental science & technology · 2023Article
- Article
- Regional patterns and drivers of total nitrogen trends in the Chesapeake Bay watershed: Insights from machine learning approaches and management implications.Water research · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Understanding drivers of water quality in local watersheds is the first step for implementing targeted restoration practices. Nutrient inventories can inform water quality management decisions by identifying shifts in nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) balances over space and time while also keeping track of the likely urban and agricultural point and nonpoint sources of pollution. The Chesapeake Bay Program's Chesapeake Assessment Scenario Tool (CAST) provides N and P balance data for counties throughout the Chesapeake Bay watershed, and these data were leveraged to create a detailed nutrient inventory for all the counties in the watershed from 1985-2019. This study focuses on three primary watershed nutrient balance components-agricultural surplus, atmospheric deposition, and point source loads-which are thought to be the leading anthropogenic drivers of nutrient loading trends across the watershed. All inputs, outputs, and derived metrics (n=53) like agricultural surplus and nutrient use efficiency, were subjected to short- and long-term trend analyses to discern how sources of pollution to surface water have changed over time. Across the watershed from 1985-2019, downward trends in atmospheric deposition were ubiquitous. Though there are varying effects, long-term declines in agricultural surplus were observed, likely because nutrients are being managed more efficiently. Multiple counties' point source loads declined, primarily associated with upgrades at major cities that discharge treated wastewater directly to tidal waters. Despite all of these positive developments, recent increases in agricultural surpluses from 2009-2019 highlight that water quality gains may soon be reversed in many agricultural areas of the basin. Besides tracking progress and jurisdictional influence on pollution sources, the nutrient inventory can be used for retrospective water quality analysis to highlight drivers of past improvement/degradation of water quality trends and for decision makers to develop and track their near- and long-term watershed restoration strategies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.