ArticleHeliyon2023
Safety and efficacy of a nurse-led elective cardioversion with etomidate for atrial arrhythmia in a tertiary hospital.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Management of cardiac arrhythmias often requires direct current cardioversion (DCC) to restore sinus rhythm. This intervention varies greatly between countries and hospitals, mostly regarding the organization of an elective DCC, and the choice of the sedation. The aim of this study is to assess the safety and efficacy of an elective DCC performed in a cardiology day hospital, led by trained nurses, and using intravenous Etomidate as sedation. We performed a retrospective cohort study at a single tertiary hospital in Belgium. Data were collected from January 2017 to October 2020. A total of 788 electrical cardioversions were performed on 574 patients from 2017 to 2020. Age was 70.9 ± 10 years. Restoration of sinus rhythm was obtained in 89.5% of the patients. One (0.1%) patient experienced ischemic stroke within 24 h, despite adequate anticoagulation. There were 4 (0.5%) cases of transient sinus arrest requiring atropine. Three patients (0.4%) experienced respiratory depression, requiring bag-mask ventilation but not oro-tracheal intubation. There were no cases of hypotension. No periprocedural death was reported. In conclusion, an elective electrical cardioversion performed and led by trained nurses, using Etomidate as sedation, appears to be both safe and effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.