ArticleHeliyon2023
Building consensus on critical thinking assessment tool for undergraduate nursing students in a socialist low-middle income country: A delphi study.
Article in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: We aimed to build consensus on a holistic critical thinking (CT) assessment tool involving cognitive skills and disposition for undergraduate nursing students in a socialist low-middle income country, Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR). Background: University degree nursing education program in Lao PDR has been started since 2011 to strengthen the ability to think as professional nurse, and nursing regulations have progressively developed last decade. However, there are still few studies assessing the CT ability of nursing students in Lao PDR. Design: Delphi study. Methods: We conducted three rounds of Delphi survey of 14 panel members consisting of nursing faculty members and clinical supervisors. The first and second survey rounds involved a combination of a series of questionnaires and face-to-face interviews to obtain ideas or opinions about descriptions of the CT assessment tool. The third round was the meeting with 13 panel members to reach a consensus on the descriptions of the CT assessment tool. Results: The number of descriptions changed from 29 to 30 under seven assessment criteria of the cognitive skills and from 34 to 32 under 10 assessment criteria of the habits of mind as disposition. The panel provided active comments on the descriptions in terms of social, cultural, and educational backgrounds. Especially the descriptions of criteria applying standards and creativity were discussed from practical viewpoints such as the hierarchical social structure in hospital, limited educational resources, and the cultural value of harmony. Conclusions: The holistic CT assessment tool that resulted from the consensus is anticipated to help Laotian nursing educators to assess undergraduate nursing students' CT ability more efficiently with confidence at both the university and hospitals continuously. Subsequent implementation of the CT assessment tool in a socialist low-middle income country is warranted.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.