Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37089334›Full record

ReviewHeliyon2023

Deepfakes as a threat to a speaker and facial recognition: An overview of tools and attack vectors.

Anton Firc, Kamil Malinka, Petr Hanáček

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Heliyon, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Anton FircBrno University of Technology, Božetěchova 2, Brno, 612 00, Czech Republic.
Kamil MalinkaBrno University of Technology, Božetěchova 2, Brno, 612 00, Czech Republic.
Petr HanáčekBrno University of Technology, Božetěchova 2, Brno, 612 00, Czech Republic.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Deepfakes present an emerging threat in cyberspace. Recent developments in machine learning make deepfakes highly believable, and very difficult to differentiate between what is real and what is fake. Not only humans but also machines struggle to identify deepfakes. Current speaker and facial recognition systems might be easily fooled by carefully prepared synthetic media - deepfakes. We provide a detailed overview of the state-of-the-art deepfake creation and detection methods for selected visual and audio domains. In contrast to other deepfake surveys, we focus on the threats that deepfakes represent to biometrics systems (e.g., spoofing). We discuss both facial and speech deepfakes, and for each domain, we define deepfake categories and their differences. For each deepfake category, we provide an overview of available tools for creation, datasets, and detection methods. Our main contribution is a definition of attack vectors concerning the differences between categories and reported real-world attacks to evaluate each category's threats to selected categories of biometrics systems.

Indexed as

Biometrics systemsCybersecurityDeepfake detectionFace deepfakesFacial recognitionSpeaker recognitionSpeech deepfakes

Identifiers

PMID37089334
PMCPMC10114207

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.