ArticlemHealth2023
Development and validation of a prototype multimedia application to enhance health education on the pelvic floor muscles among pregnant and puerperal women in Brazil.
Article in mHealth, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Women are interested in and need to receive more information about pelvic floor muscles (PFMs), its functions, and dysfunctions. The aim of this study is to develop and validate a multimedia application (app) aimed to enhance health education on PFM among pregnant and postpartum women in Brazil. Methods: This is a descriptive, transversal study in the modality of technological production, consisting of three stages, namely, bibliographic review, development of the multimedia app prototype, and validation of the multimedia app by specialists in the fields of health and technology as well as pregnant and postpartum women. The validation specialists answered an instrument that evaluated several skills including functioning, content, language, illustrations, general aspects, innovation and design, and level of satisfaction. The data obtained were tabulated and analyzed using Microsoft Excel for Windows Results: The app presented a CVI of 0.89 by experts and 0.93 by the participating pregnant and postpartum women, with a global CVI of 0.91. The level of agreement between professionals and the participating pregnant and postpartum women was 93.7% and 95.8%, respectively, resulting in an overall level of agreement of 94.8%. Conclusions: The educational material in the app format was evaluated based on its functionality, content, language, illustrations, design, and innovation. Furthermore, the content has been validated for pregnant and postpartum women. Thus, this content will contribute to the promotion of health education and dissemination of information regarding PFM, its functions, and dysfunctions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.