Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37089244›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2023

Visual Literacy of Molecular Biology Revealed through a Card-Sorting Task.

Dina L Newman, Hannah Spector, Anna Neuenschwander, Anna J Miller, Lauren Trumpore, L Kate Wright

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Metabolic Supercharging: Active Learning Strategies for Increasing Student Engagement With Metabolism.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Community college biology students' understanding ofJournal of microbiology & biology education · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Dina L NewmanThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2983-1102
Hannah SpectorThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA.
Anna NeuenschwanderThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA.
Anna J MillerThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA.
Lauren TrumporeThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA.
L Kate WrightThomas H. Gosnell School of Life Sciences, Rochester Institute of Technology, Rochester, New York, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Visual literacy, which is the ability to effectively identify, interpret, evaluate, use, and create images and visual media, is an important aspect of science literacy. As molecular processes are not directly observable, researchers and educators rely on visual representations (e.g., drawings) to communicate ideas in biology. How learners interpret and organize those numerous diagrams is related to their underlying knowledge about biology and their skills in visual literacy. Furthermore, it is not always obvious how and why learners interpret diagrams in the way they do (especially if their interpretations are unexpected), as it is not possible to "see" inside the minds of learners and directly observe the inner workings of their brains. Hence, tools that allow for the investigation of visual literacy are needed. Here, we present a novel card-sorting task based on visual literacy skills to investigate how learners interpret and think about DNA-based concepts. We quantified differences in performance between groups of varying expertise and in pre- and postcourse settings using percentages of expected card pairings and edit distance to a perfect sort. Overall, we found that biology experts organized the visual representations based on deep conceptual features, while biology learners (novices) more often organized based on surface features, such as color and style. We also found that students performed better on the task after a course in which molecular biology concepts were taught, suggesting the activity is a useful and valid tool for measuring knowledge. We have provided the cards to the community for use as a classroom activity, as an assessment instrument, and/or as a useful research tool to probe student ideas about molecular biology.

Indexed as

card sortingconceptual understandingmolecular biologyvisual literacyvisual representations

Identifiers

PMID37089244
PMCPMC10117137

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.