Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37089223›Full record

ArticleJournal of microbiology & biology education2023

Discussion of Annotated Research Articles Results in Increases in Scientific Literacy within a Cell Biology Course.

Mary E Washburn, Ryan A Shanks, Melissa McCartney, Chuck L Robertson, Miriam Segura-Totten

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of microbiology & biology education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Diving into research without wading through content: A skills-based cell biology course emphasizing the unknown.Biochemistry and molecular biology education : a bimonthly publication of the International Union of Biochemistry and Molecular Biology
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Mary E WashburnDepartment of Plant Biology, University of Georgia, Athens, Georgia, USA.
Ryan A ShanksBiology Department, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0915-7800
Melissa McCartneyDepartment of Biological Sciences and STEM Transformation Institute, Florida International University, Miami, Florida, USA.
Chuck L RobertsonDepartment of Psychological Science, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, Georgia, USA.
Miriam Segura-TottenBiology Department, University of North Georgia, Dahlonega, Georgia, USA.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1520-0649

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the amount and complexity of scientific knowledge continues to grow, it is essential to educate scientifically literate citizens who can comprehend the process of science and the implications of technological advances. This is especially important when educating science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) college students, since they may play a central role in the future of scientific research and its communication. A central part of decoding and interpreting scientific information is the ability to analyze scientific research articles. For this reason, many different approaches for reading scientific research articles have been developed and published. Despite the availability of numerous ways of analyzing scientific research articles, biology students can face challenges that may prevent them from fully comprehending the text. We sought to address student challenges with science vocabulary and content knowledge by adding structural supports to in-classroom article discussions through the use of annotated articles from the Science in the Classroom initiative. We describe the pedagogical approach used for discussing scientific research articles within a required biology course. In this context, we found that students' scientific literacy skills increased at the end of the semester. We also found that, for each article discussed, the majority of students could interpret graphical representations of article results and that they could identify and comprehend components of the experimental design of the study.

Indexed as

data interpretationexperimental designprimary literatureprocess of scienceresearch articlesscientific literacySTEM education

Identifiers

PMID37089223
PMCPMC10117138

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.