ArticleAesthetic surgery journal. Open forum2023
Guidelines for Optimal Patient Outcomes Using Calcium Hydroxylapatite for Jawline Contour.
Article in Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Panfacial Approach to Rejuvenation Using Calcium Hydroxylapatite: A Case Series Illustrating Calcium Hydroxylapatite Versatility Through Dilution and a Multilayered Treatment Approach.Aesthetic surgery journal. Open forum · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Calcium hydroxylapatite (CaHA(+); Radiesse(+) [Merz North America, Inc., Raleigh, NC]) is the first FDA-approved injectable filler for subdermal and/or supraperiosteal injection to improve moderate-to-severe loss of jawline contour. CaHA has been recognized in the past for its ability to provide contour and support overlying tissues and utilized for jawline augmentation well before this recent indication; however, with recent FDA approval of CaHA(+) for jawline contour improvement, it is important that clinicians are aware of best practices for patient selection, treatment planning and injection, as well as safety considerations and postprocedure care. Objectives: To provide guidance on best practices for patient assessment and on-label use of CaHA(+) for jawline rejuvenation and augmentation. Methods: As part of a 2-h roundtable discussion, 5 clinicians with expertise in both the use of CaHA(+) and jawline treatment discussed patient selection, CaHA(+) injection technique, and important safety measures, with the purpose of developing guidance to support optimal clinical use. Results: The most common applications of CaHA(+) in the jawline are rejuvenation of the prejowl sulcus, recontouring the jawline, and providing definition to the gonial angle. Improving the gonial angle is of particular interest as it is a procedure sought by patients of all genders and ages. Variations in technique are discussed and case studies are presented. Conclusions: Jawline augmentation is a procedure with wide-ranging appeal for a diverse array of patients. CaHA(+) is an ideal filler for jawline augmentation due to its rheologic properties (high Level of Evidence 5:
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.