Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37088998›Full record

ArticleAnnals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery2023

Laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis: Any time is a good time.

Hamza Wani, Sadananda Meher, Uppalapati Srinivasulu, Laxmi Narayanan Mohanty, Madhusudan Modi, Mohammad Ibrarullah

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Annals of hepato-biliary-pancreatic surgery, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Outcomes of acute moderate cholecystitis management techniques: percutaneous transhepatic gallbladder drainage and early laparoscopic cholecystectomy.Ulusal travma ve acil cerrahi dergisi = Turkish journal of trauma & emergency surgery : TJTES · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Hamza WaniDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, All India Institute of Medical Sciences, Bhopal, Madhya Pradesh, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9417-6220
Sadananda MeherDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Apollo Hospitals, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8676-0670
Uppalapati SrinivasuluDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Apollo Hospitals, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6293-7411
Laxmi Narayanan MohantyDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Apollo Hospitals, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1916-8026
Madhusudan ModiDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Apollo Hospitals, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0734-360X
Mohammad IbrarullahDepartment of Surgical Gastroenterology, Apollo Hospitals, Bhubaneswar, Odisha, India.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1992-701X

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Backgrounds/Aims: Laparoscopic cholecystectomy within one week of acute cholecystitis is considered safe and advantageous. Surgery beyond first week is reserved for non-resolving attack or complications. To compare clinical outcomes of patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy in the first week and between two to six weeks of an attack of acute cholecystitis. Methods: In an analysis of a prospectively maintained database, all patients who underwent laparoscopic cholecystectomy for acute cholecystitis were divided into two groups: group A, operated within one week; and group B, operated between two to six weeks of an attack. Main variables studied were mean operative time, conversion to open cholecystectomy, morbidity profile, and duration of hospital stay. Results: A total of 116 patients (74 in group A and 42 in group B) were included. Mean interval between onset of symptoms & surgery was five days (range, 1-7 days) in group A and 12 days (range, 8-20 days) in group B. Operative time and incidence of subtotal cholecystectomy were higher in group B (statistically not significant). Mean postoperative stay was 2 days in group A and 3 days in group B. Laparoscopy was converted to open cholecystectomy in two patients in each group. There was no incidence of biliary injury. One patient in group B died during the postoperative period due to continued sepsis and multiorgan failure. Conclusions: In tertiary care setting, with adequate surgical expertise, laparoscopic cholecystectomy can be safely performed in patients with acute cholecystitis irrespective of the time of presentation.

Indexed as

Acute cholecystitisGangrenous cholecystitisLaparoscopy

Identifiers

PMID37088998
PMCPMC10472128

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.