Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37088828›Full record

ArticleMalaria journal2023

Impacts of dual active-ingredient bed nets on the behavioural responses of pyrethroid resistant Anopheles gambiae determined by room-scale infrared video tracking.

Katherine Gleave, Amy Guy, Frank Mechan, Mischa Emery, Annabel Murphy, Vitaly Voloshin, Catherine E Towers, David Towers, Hilary Ranson, Geraldine M Foster and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Malaria journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
5.5field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 19 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Machine learning reveals immediate disruption in mosquito flight when exposed to Olyset nets.Current research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2025
    Article
  7. Article
  8. Behavioural responses ofCurrent research in parasitology & vector-borne diseases · 2024
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Katherine GleaveVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Amy GuyVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Frank MechanVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Mischa EmeryVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Annabel MurphyVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Vitaly VoloshinSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Catherine E TowersSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
David TowersSchool of Engineering, University of Warwick, Coventry, UK.
Hilary RansonVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Geraldine M FosterVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK.
Philip J McCallVector Biology Department, Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine, Liverpool, UK. Philip.McCall@lstmed.ac.uk.
Liverpool School of Tropical Medicine · GBUniversity of Warwick · GB

Funding

Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation OPP1159078
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe success of insecticide treated bed nets (ITNs) for malaria vector control in Africa relies on the behaviour of various species of Anopheles. Previous research has described mosquito behavioural alterations resulting from widespread ITN coverage, which could result in a decrease in net efficacy. Here, behaviours were compared including timings of net contact, willingness to refeed and longevity post-exposure to two next-generation nets, PermaNet

methodsSusceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae mosquitoes were exposed to the nets with a human volunteer host in a room-scale assay. Mosquito movements were tracked for 2 h using an infrared video system, collecting flight trajectory, spatial position and net contact data. Post-assay, mosquitoes were monitored for a range of sublethal insecticide effects.

resultsMosquito net contact was focused predominantly on the roof for all four bed nets. A steep decay in activity was observed for both susceptible strains when P3 net and OL net were present and with IG2 net for one of the two susceptible strains. Total mosquito activity was higher around untreated nets than ITNs. There was no difference in total activity, the number, or duration, of net contact, between any mosquito strain, with similar behaviours recorded in susceptible and resistant strains at all ITNs. OL net, P3 net and IG2 net all killed over 90% of susceptible mosquitoes 24 h after exposure, but this effect was not seen with resistant mosquitoes where mortality ranged from 16 to 72%. All treated nets reduced the willingness of resistant strains to re-feed when offered blood 1-h post-exposure, with a more pronounced effect seen with P3 net and OL net than IG2 net.

conclusionThese are the first results to provide an in-depth description of the behaviour of susceptible and resistant Anopheles gambiae strains around next-generation bed nets using a room-scale tracking system to capture multiple behaviours. These results indicate that there is no major difference in behavioural responses between mosquito strains of differing pyrethroid susceptibility when exposed to these new ITNs under the experimental conditions used.

Indexed as

AnophelesInsecticidesInsecticide-Treated BednetsMalariaPyrethrinsAnimalsHumansInsecticide ResistanceMosquito ControlMosquito VectorsInsecticidesPyrethrins

Identifiers

PMID37088828
PMCPMC10122874
OpenAlexW4366783376

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.