Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37088814›Full record

SynthesisBMC medical education2023

Why might medical student empathy change throughout medical school? a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies.

Jeremy Howick, Maya Dudko, Shi Nan Feng, Ahmed Abdirashid Ahmed, Namitha Alluri, Keith Nockels, Rachel Winter, Richard Holland

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in BMC medical education, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 41 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
41citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
16.9field-weighted citation impact, top 1% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

41 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 76 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Efficacy of interventions aimed at reducing explicit and implicit weight bias in healthcare students: A systematic review and meta-analysis.Obesity reviews : an official journal of the International Association for the Study of Obesity · 2025
    Pooled it
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. "Medical science educator · 2026
    Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Re-visioning intercultural relational empathy.Advances in health sciences education : theory and practice · 2026
    Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Review
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Jeremy HowickMedical School, Stoneygate Centre for Excellence in Empathic Healthcare, University of Leicester, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Lancaster Rd, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK. jh815@leicester.ac.uk.
Maya DudkoMedical School, Stoneygate Centre for Excellence in Empathic Healthcare, University of Leicester, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Lancaster Rd, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK.
Shi Nan FengThe University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
Ahmed Abdirashid AhmedMedical School, Stoneygate Centre for Excellence in Empathic Healthcare, University of Leicester, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Lancaster Rd, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK.
Namitha AlluriDartmouth College, Hanover, NH, USA.
Keith NockelsUniversity Library, University of Leicester, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK.
Rachel WinterMedical School, Stoneygate Centre for Excellence in Empathic Healthcare, University of Leicester, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Lancaster Rd, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK.
Richard HollandMedical School, Stoneygate Centre for Excellence in Empathic Healthcare, University of Leicester, University of Leicester, George Davies Centre, Lancaster Rd, Leicester, LE1 7HA, UK.
University of Leicester · GBDartmouth College · USUniversity of North Carolina at Chapel Hill · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundSeveral studies suggest that medical student empathy declines throughout medical school. However, no studies have synthesised the evidence regarding why empathy declines.

objectiveTo conduct a systematic review and thematic synthesis of qualitative studies investigating why student empathy may change throughout medical school.

methodsWe included any qualitative study that investigated why empathy might change during medical school. We searched the Medline, Scopus, CINAHL, ERIC, and APA PsycInfo databases for relevant studies. All databases were searched from their inception to 18 July 2022. We also searched the reference lists of the included studies and contacted experts to identify additional studies. We used the Joanna Briggs Institute tool to evaluate the risk of bias in the included studies. Overall confidence in our results was assessed using the Confidence in the Evidence from Reviews of Qualitative research (CERQual) approach. We used thematic methods to synthesise our findings.

resultsOur searches yielded 2523 records, and 16 studies involving a total of 771 students were eligible for analysis. Most studies (n = 11) were from Europe or North America. The descriptive themes and sub-themes were identified for each study. Increased complexity in patients and their diseases, together with the 'hidden curriculum' (including a stressful workload, prioritisation of biomedical knowledge, and (sometimes) poor role models), led to student adaptations, such as cynicism and desensitisation. Students' prior lives and professional experiences appeared to exacerbate the decline in empathy. However, there were bias concerns for most of the included studies. DISCUSSION: Many of the included studies included were small, and some did not include demographic participant data. Given the likely benefits of providing empathic care for patients and practitioners, medical education interventions should focus on developing an 'empathic hidden curriculum' that mitigates the decline in medical student empathy.

trial registrationA protocol for this systematic review was submitted for registration with the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) on 28 July 2022 (registration number CRD42022347856).

Indexed as

Students, MedicalEmpathyHumansQualitative ResearchSchools, MedicalCommunicationEducationEmpathyMedical schoolQualitativeSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID37088814
PMCPMC10124056
OpenAlexW4366782154

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.