ArticleScientific reports2023
Transformer's frequency response analysis results interpretation using a novel cross entropy based methodology.
Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Harnessing the potential of lead-free BiFeORSC advances · 2026Article
- Design of a Synergistic Active-Passive Shielding System Using Fe-Based Amorphous Alloy.ACS omega · 2025Article
- Energy optimization model of multi-energy system considering distributed photovoltaic coordinated carbon reduction.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Transformer defects can be identified by the FRA (frequency response analysis) that is a promising diagnostic technique. Despite the standardization in FRA measuring technique, its results interpretation is yet a research area. Because different faults types can be identified in various frequency bounds of the FRA signatures, it is necessary to identify the possible relationships between specific failures and frequency ranges in this contribution. For this purpose, a real transformer is used to conduct the essential tests, which include both healthy and faulted circumstances (axial displacement (AD), radial deformation (RD), and short-circuits (SC)). To identify efficient characteristics from the produced frequency response traces and improve interpretation accuracy of such traces, a new hyperbolic fuzzy cross entropy (FCE) measure is demonstrated and then utilized for the aim of discrimination and classification of transformer winding defects in pre-defined frequency ranges. After normalizing FRA results of the transformer under healthy and various fault circumstances the lower bounds from such responses have been extracted and then utilized to construct the desired form of the fuzzy sets of healthy and faulted circumstances. Then, a new hyperbolic FCE measure-based discrimination and classification of winding faults methodology is offered on the basis of highest and lowest FCE measure values. The highest FCE measure value between the fuzzy sets of healthy and faulted circumstances such as AD, RD and SC is designated to confirm the occurrence of winding faults in a suitable frequency range. The suggested methodology ensures smart interpretation of FRA signature and accurate classification of winding faults as it can effectively discriminate both healthy and faulted circumstances in the desired frequency ranges. The proposed approaches' performance is tested and compared by applying the experimental data after feature extraction.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.