Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37088597›Full record

Trial reportEuropean urology2023

Relationship Between Baseline Prostate-specific Antigen on Cancer Detection and Prostate Cancer Death: Long-term Follow-up from the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer.

Sebastiaan Remmers, Chris H Bangma, Rebecka A Godtman, Sigrid V Carlsson, Anssi Auvinen, Teuvo L J Tammela, Louis J Denis, Vera Nelen, Arnauld Villers, Xavier Rebillard and 11 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in European urology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 17 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
7.5field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Bioprinted research models of urological malignancy.Exploration (Beijing, China) · 2024
    Review
  13. Modifying and personalizing prostate cancer screening.Translational andrology and urology · 2024
    Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors at 13 institutions in 9 countries.

Sebastiaan RemmersDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands. Electronic address: s.remmers@erasmusmc.nl.
Chris H BangmaDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Rebecka A GodtmanDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden.
Sigrid V CarlssonDepartment of Urology, Institute of Clinical Sciences, Sahlgrenska Academy at Goteborg University, Goteborg, Sweden; Departments of Surgery (Urology Service) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Anssi AuvinenSchool of Health Sciences, University of Tampere, Tampere, Finland.
Teuvo L J TammelaDepartment of Urology, Tampere University and Tampere University Hospital, Tampere, Finland.
Louis J DenisDepartment of Urology, Meeting Centre Antwerp, Antwerp, Belgium.
Vera NelenProvincial Institute for Hygiene, Antwerp, Belgium.
Arnauld VillersDepartment of Urology, Université Lille Nord de France, Lille, France.
Xavier RebillardDepartment of Urology, Clinique Beau Soleil, Montpellier, France.
Maciej KwiatkowskiDepartment of Urology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland; Medical Faculty, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland; Department of Urology, Academic Hospital Braunschweig, Braunschweig, Germany.
Franz ReckerPolyClinic St. Moritz/Scuol, Switzerland.
Stephen WylerDepartment of Urology, Kantonsspital Aarau, Aarau, Switzerland; Medical Faculty, University of Basel, Basel, Switzerland.
Marco ZappaOncologic Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.
Donella PulitiOncologic Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.
Giuseppe GoriniOncologic Network, Prevention and Research Institute (ISPRO), Florence, Italy.
Alvaro PaezDepartment of Urology, Hospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada, Madrid, Spain.
Marcos LujanDepartment of Urology, Hospital Infanta Cristina, Madrid, Spain.
Daan NieboerDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands; Department of Public Health, Erasmus MC, University Medical Center Rotterdam, Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Fritz H SchröderDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Monique J RoobolDepartment of Urology, Erasmus MC Cancer Institute, University Medical Center Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Erasmus MC Cancer Institute · NLClinique du Millénaire · FRHospital Universitario de Fuenlabrada · ESHospital Universitario Infanta Cristina · ESKantonsspital Aarau · CHMemorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center · USProvince of Antwerp · BEProvincial Institute for Hygiene · BETampere University · FITampere University · FIUniversité Lille Nord de France · FRUniversity of Basel · CHUniversity of Gothenburg · SE

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe European Association of Urology guidelines recommend a risk-based strategy for prostate cancer screening based on the first prostate-specific antigen (PSA) level and age.

objectiveTo analyze the impact of the first PSA level on prostate cancer (PCa) detection and PCa-specific mortality (PCSM) in a population-based screening trial (repeat screening every 2-4 yr). DESIGN, SETTING, AND

participantsWe evaluated 25589 men aged 55-59 yr, 16898 men aged 60-64 yr, and 12936 men aged 65-69 yr who attended at least one screening visit in the European Randomized Study of Screening for Prostate Cancer (ERSPC) trial (screening arm: repeat PSA testing every 2-4 yr and biopsy in cases with elevated PSA; control arm: no active screening offered) during 16-yr follow-up (FU). OUTCOME MEASUREMENTS AND STATISTICAL ANALYSIS: We assessed the actuarial probability for any PCa and for clinically significant (cs)PCa (Gleason ≥7). Cox proportional-hazards regression was performed to assess whether the association between baseline PSA and PCSM was comparable for all age groups. A Lorenz curve was computed to assess the association between baseline PSA and PCSM for men aged 60-61 yr. RESULTS AND LIMITATIONS: The overall actuarial probability at 16 yr ranged from 12% to 16% for any PCa and from 3.7% to 5.7% for csPCa across the age groups. The actuarial probability of csPCa at 16 yr ranged from 1.2-1.5% for men with PSA <1.0 ng/ml to 13.3-13.8% for men with PSA ≥3.0 ng/ml. The association between baseline PSA and PCSM differed marginally among the three age groups. A Lorenz curve for men aged 60-61 yr showed that 92% of lethal PCa cases occurred among those with PSA above the median (1.21 ng/ml). In addition, for men initially screened at age 60-61 yr with baseline PSA <2 ng/ml, further continuation of screening is unlikely to be beneficial after the age of 68-70 yr if PSA is still <2 ng/ml. No case of PCSM emerged in the subsequent 8 yr (up to age 76-78 yr). A limitation is that these results may not be generalizable to an opportunistic screening setting or to contemporary clinical practice.

conclusionsIn all age groups, baseline PSA can guide decisions on the repeat screening interval. Baseline PSA of <1.0 ng/ml for men aged 55-69 yr is a strong indicator to delay or stop further screening. PATIENT SUMMARY: In prostate cancer screening, the patient's baseline PSA (prostate-specific antigen) level can be used to guide decisions on when to repeat screening. The PSA test when used according to current knowledge is valuable in helping to reduce the burden of prostate cancer.

Indexed as

Prostate-Specific AntigenProstatic NeoplasmsAgedEarly Detection of CancerFollow-Up StudiesHumansMaleMiddle AgedRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsProstate-Specific AntigenClinical decision-makingProstate-specific antigenProstatic neoplasmsRisk stratification

Identifiers

PMID37088597
PMCPMC10759255
OpenAlexW4366607314

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.