Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37088463›Full record

ArticleLaboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology2023

Quantile Index Biomarkers Based on Single-Cell Expression Data.

Misung Yi, Tingting Zhan, Amy R Peck, Jeffrey A Hooke, Albert J Kovatich, Craig D Shriver, Hai Hu, Yunguang Sun, Hallgeir Rui, Inna Chervoneva

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Laboratory investigation; a journal of technical methods and pathology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Quantile index predictors using R package hyper.gam.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Misung YiDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: misung.yi@jefferson.edu.
Tingting ZhanDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania.
Amy R PeckDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Jeffrey A HookeJohn P. Murtha Cancer Center, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Albert J KovatichJohn P. Murtha Cancer Center, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Craig D ShriverJohn P. Murtha Cancer Center, Uniformed Services University and Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, Maryland.
Hai HuChan Soon-Shiong Institute of Molecular Medicine at Windber, Windber, Pennsylvania.
Yunguang SunDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Hallgeir RuiDepartment of Pathology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, Wisconsin.
Inna ChervonevaDivision of Biostatistics, Department of Pharmacology and Experimental Therapeutics, Sidney Kimmel Medical College, Thomas Jefferson University, Philadelphia, Pennsylvania. Electronic address: inna.chervoneva@jefferson.edu.

Funding

Statistical Methods For Quantitative Immunohistochemistry BiomarkersR01CA222847 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI CHERVONEVA, INNA · 2019 to 2023
$1.8M
Prolactin pathways and metastatic progression of ER-positive breast cancerR01CA188575 · NCI · THOMAS JEFFERSON UNIVERSITY · PI RUI, HALLGEIR · 2015 to 2019
$1.8M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA188575NCI NIH HHS R01 CA222847
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Current histocytometry methods enable single-cell quantification of biomolecules in tumor tissue sections by multiple detection technologies, including multiplex fluorescence-based immunohistochemistry or in situ hybridization. Quantitative pathology platforms can provide distributions of cellular signal intensity (CSI) levels of biomolecules across the entire cell populations of interest within the sampled tumor tissue. However, the heterogeneity of CSI levels is usually ignored, and the simple mean signal intensity value is considered a cancer biomarker. Here we consider the entire distribution of CSI expression levels of a given biomolecule in the cancer cell population as a predictor of clinical outcome. The proposed quantile index (QI) biomarker is defined as the weighted average of CSI distribution quantiles in individual tumors. The weight for each quantile is determined by fitting a functional regression model for a clinical outcome. That is, the weights are optimized so that the resulting QI has the highest power to predict a relevant clinical outcome. The proposed QI biomarkers were derived for proteins expressed in cancer cells of malignant breast tumors and demonstrated improved prognostic value compared with the standard mean signal intensity predictors. The R package Qindex implementing QI biomarkers has been developed. The proposed approach is not limited to immunohistochemistry data and can be based on any cell-level expressions of proteins or nucleic acids.

Indexed as

Biomarkers, TumorBreast NeoplasmsBiomarkersFemaleHumansImmunohistochemistryProteinsBiomarkersBiomarkers, TumorProteinscancer biomarkerdistribution quantileslinear functional Cox modelmultiplex immunofluorescence-immunohistochemistrysingle-cell imaging

Identifiers

PMID37088463
PMCPMC10524910

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.