ArticleClinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon)2023
A portable visual biofeedback device can accurately measure and improve hip extension angle in individuals post-stroke.
Article in Clinical biomechanics (Bristol, Avon), 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Examination of effect and responder to real-time auditory feedback during overground gait for stroke: a randomized cross-over study.Scientific reports · 2025Trial
- Low-cost Devices for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Review of Approaches, Designs, and Evidence.Restorative neurology and neuroscience · 2026Review
- Inertial measurement unit-based real-time feedback gait immediately changes gait parameters in older inpatients: a pilot study.Frontiers in physiology · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundVisual biofeedback has shown success in improving gait mechanics in individuals post-stroke but has typically been restricted to use on a treadmill or a short walkway. Using real-time visual biofeedback during overground walking could increase the ease of clinical translation of this method. The objective was to investigate the reliability of a real-time hip extension feedback device during unconstrained, overground walking. We hypothesized that the peak hip extension angle outcome of our device would be comparable to peak hip extension angle measured from a common motion capture system. In addition, we hypothesized that individuals post-stroke would increase their hip extension angle after a single walking bout with visual biofeedback of their hip extension angle.
methodsFourteen individuals with chronic stroke walked for one six-minute walking bout with the visual biofeedback device. Before (pre-training) and after (post-training) the feedback walking bout, participants walked in a straight line at their self-selected speed for at least five steps per foot.
findingsOur device was reliable in measuring peak hip extension angle when compared to 3D motion capture equipment (R
interpretationOur novel and inexpensive biofeedback method may provide benefit for individuals post-stroke and expand the possibilities for feedback in rehabilitation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.