ArticleCJEM2023
Impact of Health Link utilization on emergency department visits.
Article in CJEM, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesOur aim was to compare Health Link utilization in urban and rural Alberta by metrics relevant to the ED.
methodsData on Health Link callers from January 1, 2018-December 31, 2019 was extracted from the National Ambulatory Care Reporting System, including postal code, location of ED attended, Canadian Triage Acuity Scale (CTAS) assigned at ED, age, and self-identified gender. Usage density (presentations/100/year), patient demographics (age, self-identified gender), and ED metrics (CTAS, investigations, admission) were compared for Health Link ED referrals and direct ED visits.
resultsIn this period, 900,196 individuals called Health Link, 241,103 were referred to the ED, 58% (140,614) of which presented to the ED within 24 h of their call. These referrals constituted 3.4% of the total ED visit population (4,194,735). Looking at the density of ED utilization, this is greater in rural than urban settings with respect to patients who present directly to the ED (90.9 vs. 36.5 presentations/100/year). There is a sparser density of Health Link ED visits in rural settings than in urban centres (1.5 vs. 1.6). Urban ED presentations were more often triaged as a CTAS 1-3 than a CTAS 4-5 if they had presented after a Health Link referral (76.0% CTAS 1-3) than a direct ED visit (63.0% CTAS 1-3). This effect is greater for rural patients, who also more likely to present as a CTAS 1-3 than a CTAS 4-5 if they were referred through Health Link (61.1% CTAS 1-3) compared to those who directly went to the ED (39.0% CTAS 1-3).
conclusionsThis study on Health Link describes how tele-health can often triage higher acuity patients to appropriately receive ED level care, which may be important for future development of health care and ED infrastructure.
Indexed as
Identifiers
37087714What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.