ArticleSe pu = Chinese journal of chromatography2023
[Determination of 18 caine anesthetics in animal meat using solid phase extraction combined with ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry].
Article in Se pu = Chinese journal of chromatography, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
- Fishery Anesthetics in Aquaculture Products: Safety Concerns and Analytical Methods.Foods (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Because of the widespread application of anesthetic drugs in the fields of animal breeding and transportation, demand for the rapid, sensitive detection of anesthetic drugs in animal meat is increasing. The complex animal meat matrix contains various interfering substances, such as proteins, fats, and phospholipids, along with anesthetic drug residues at very low concentrations. Therefore, adopting appropriate pretreatment methods is necessary to improve the sensitivity of detection. In this study, a rapid, accurate analytical method based on ultra-performance liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (UPLC-MS/MS) and solid phase extraction (SPE) was established to determine the contents of 18 caines in animal meat. The MS parameters, such as the collision energies of 18 caines, were optimized. Furthermore, the chromatographic separation conditions and response intensities of the caine in different mobile phases were compared. The effects of different pretreatment conditions on the extraction efficiencies of the 18 caines in meat samples and those of different purification conditions, such as extraction solvent, SPE column, and dimethylsulfoxide (DMSO) dosage, on their recoveries were investigated. Combined with the external standard method, the 18 caines in meat were successfully quantified. Sample pretreatment is a three-step process. First, in ultrasound-assisted extraction, 2.0 g samples were added to 2.0 mL water and extracted using 10 mL 0.1% (v/v) formic acid in acetonitrile under ultrasound conditions for 10 min. SPE was then performed using an Oasis PRIME HLB column. Finally, DMSO-assisted concentration was employed: the organic layer was collected and dried at 40 ℃ under a stream of N
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.