Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37087541›Full record

ReviewAnnals of biomedical engineering2023

Models of Cochlea Used in Cochlear Implant Research: A Review.

Filip Hrncirik, Iwan Roberts, Ilkem Sevgili, Chloe Swords, Manohar Bance

Open access · hybridAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Annals of biomedical engineering, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.2field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 24 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Filip HrncirikCambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK. fh371@cam.ac.uk.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2286-848X
Iwan RobertsCambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK.
Ilkem SevgiliCambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK.
Chloe SwordsCambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK.
Manohar BanceCambridge Hearing Group, Cambridge, UK.
University of Cambridge · GB

Funding

Wellcome Trust RG93172
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

As the first clinically translated machine-neural interface, cochlear implants (CI) have demonstrated much success in providing hearing to those with severe to profound hearing loss. Despite their clinical effectiveness, key drawbacks such as hearing damage, partly from insertion forces that arise during implantation, and current spread, which limits focussing ability, prevent wider CI eligibility. In this review, we provide an overview of the anatomical and physical properties of the cochlea as a resource to aid the development of accurate models to improve future CI treatments. We highlight the advancements in the development of various physical, animal, tissue engineering, and computational models of the cochlea and the need for such models, challenges in their use, and a perspective on their future directions.

Indexed as

Cochlear ImplantationCochlear ImplantsAnimalsCochleaHearingTreatment OutcomeAdditive manufacturingCochlea anatomyCochlea modelsCochlear implants

Identifiers

PMID37087541
PMCPMC10264527
OpenAlexW4366769495

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.