Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37087517›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2023

Extracting Group Velocity Dispersion values using quantum-mimic Optical Coherence Tomography and Machine Learning.

Krzysztof A Maliszewski, Magdalena A Urbańska, Piotr Kolenderski, Varvara Vetrova, Sylwia M Kolenderska

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Krzysztof A Maliszewski *School of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Magdalena A UrbańskaMassey AgriFood (MAF) Digital Lab, Massey University, Palmerston North, New Zealand.
Piotr KolenderskiFaculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland.
Varvara VetrovaSchool of Mathematics and Statistics, University of Canterbury, Christchurch, New Zealand.
Sylwia M Kolenderska *Faculty of Physics, Astronomy and Informatics, Nicolaus Copernicus University, Toruń, Poland. skol745@aucklanduni.ac.nz.

Funding

Fundacja na rzecz Nauki Polskiej First Team/2017-3/20
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Quantum-mimic Optical Coherence Tomography (Qm-OCT) images are cluttered with artefacts - parasitic peaks which emerge as a by-product of the algorithm used in this method. However, the shape and behaviour of an artefact are uniquely related to Group Velocity Dispersion (GVD) of the layer this artefact corresponds to and consequently, the GVD values can be inferred by carefully analysing them. Since for multi-layered objects the number of artefacts is too high to enable layer-specific analysis, we employ a solution based on Machine Learning. We train a neural network with Qm-OCT data as an input and dispersion profiles, i.e. depth distribution of GVD within an A-scan, as an output. By accounting for noise during training, we process experimental data and estimate the GVD values of BK7 and sapphire as well as provide a qualitative GVD value distribution in a grape and cucumber. Compared to other GVD-retrieving methods, our solution does not require user input, automatically provides dispersion values for all the visualised layers and is scalable. We analyse the factors affecting the accuracy of determining GVD: noise in the experimental data as well as general physical limitations of the detection of GVD-induced changes, and suggest possible solutions.

Identifiers

PMID37087517
PMCPMC10122646

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.