Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37087516›Full record

ArticleNature communications2023

Trends and variability in the Southern Annular Mode over the Common Era.

Jonathan King, Kevin J Anchukaitis, Kathryn Allen, Tessa Vance, Amy Hessl

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Nature communications, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Jonathan KingDepartment of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA. jonking93@arizona.edu.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0834-2200
Kevin J AnchukaitisDepartment of Geosciences, University of Arizona, Tucson, AZ, 85721, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8509-8080
Kathryn AllenSchool of Geography, Planning and Spatial Sciences, University of Tasmania, Hobart, 7001, Australia.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8403-4552
Tessa VanceAustralian Antarctic Program Partnership, Institute for Marine and Antarctic Studies, University of Tasmania, Hobart, Australia.
Amy HesslDepartment of Geology and Geography, West Virginia University, Morgantown, WV, USA.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0002-2279-6260

Funding

Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) FT200100102Department of Education and Training | Australian Research Council (ARC) SR140300001National Science Foundation (NSF) AGS-1803946
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The Southern Annular Mode (SAM) is the leading mode of atmospheric variability in the extratropical Southern Hemisphere and has wide ranging effects on ecosystems and societies. Despite the SAM's importance, paleoclimate reconstructions disagree on its variability and trends over the Common Era, which may be linked to variability in SAM teleconnections and the influence of specific proxies. Here, we use data assimilation with a multi-model prior to reconstruct the SAM over the last 2000 years using temperature and drought-sensitive climate proxies. Our method does not assume a stationary relationship between the SAM and the proxy records and allows us to identify critical paleoclimate records and quantify reconstruction uncertainty through time. We find no evidence for a forced response in SAM variability prior to the 20th century. We do find the modern positive trend falls outside the 2σ range of the prior 2000 years at multidecadal time scales, supporting the inference that the SAM's positive trend over the last several decades is a response to anthropogenic climate change.

Identifiers

PMID37087516
PMCPMC10122664

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.