Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37087503›Full record

Trial reportClinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society2023

Simple and safe digitoxin dosing in heart failure based on data from the DIGIT-HF trial.

Udo Bavendiek, Anika Großhennig, Johannes Schwab, Dominik Berliner, Xiaofei Liu, Lars Maier, Thomas Gaspar, Andreas Rieth, Sebastian Philipp, Rainer Hambrecht and 14 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled Trial
In one paragraph

Trial report in Clinical research in cardiology : official journal of the German Cardiac Society, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
4.0field-weighted citation impact, top 5% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. [Digitalis for heart failure: welcome back?]Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2026
    Review
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Observational
  8. Review
  9. [Antiarrhythmic drugs in the present day].Innere Medizin (Heidelberg, Germany) · 2024
    Review
  10. Review
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

24 authors at 16 institutions in 3 countries.

Udo Bavendiek *Department of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany. bavendiek.udo@mh-hannover.de.ORCID http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3911-2571
Anika Großhennig *Institute of Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Johannes SchwabDepartment of Cardiology, Paracelsus Medical University, Nuremberg, Germany.
Dominik BerlinerDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Xiaofei LiuInstitute of Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Lars MaierDepartment for Internal Medicine II, University Hospital Regensburg, Regensburg, Germany.
Thomas GasparDepartment of Internal and Cardiovascular Medicine, Herzzentrum Dresden, University Clinic, Technische Universität Dresden, Dresden, Germany.
Andreas RiethDepartment of Cardiology, Kerckhoff-Klinik, Bad Nauheim, Germany.
Sebastian PhilippDepartment of Internal Medicine, Cardiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Elbeklinikum Stade, Stade, Germany.
Rainer HambrechtDepartment of Internal Medicine II, Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Klinkum Links Der Weser, Bremen, Germany.
Ralf WestenfeldDivision of Cardiology, Pulmonology and Vascular Medicine, Medical Faculty, University Hospital Duesseldorf, Heinrich-Heine University Duesseldorf, Duesseldorf, Germany.
Thomas MünzelUniversity Medical Center Mainz, Center of Cardiology, Johannes Gutenberg University, Mainz, Germany.
Sebastian WinklerDepartment of Internal Medicine, BG Klinikum Unfallkrankenhaus Berlin, Berlin, Germany.
Martin HülsmannUniversitätsklinik Für Innere Medizin II, Abteilung Kardiologie, Medizinische Universität Wien, Vienna, Austria.
Dirk WestermannDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, University Heart Center Freiburg-Bad Krozingen, Faculty of Medicine, University of Freiburg, Freiburg, Germany.
Marja ZdravkovicUniversity Hospital Medical Center Bezanujska Kosa, Belgrade, Serbia.
Ralf LichtinghagenInstitute for Clinical Chemistry, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Heiko von der LeyenOrgenesis, Inc, Germantown, USA.
Silke ZimmermannCenter for Clinical Trials, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Christian VeltmannCenter for Electrophysiology Bremen, Bremen, Germany.
Michael BöhmKlinik Für Innere Medizin III, Universitätsklinikum Des Saarlandes, Saarland University, Homburg a. d. Saar, Germany.
Stefan StörkDepartment Clincical Reserch & Epidemiology, Comprehensive Heart Failure Center, University Hospital Würzburg, Würzburg, Germany.
Armin KochInstitute of Biostatistics, Hannover Medical School, Hannover, Germany.
Johann BauersachsDepartment of Cardiology and Angiology, Hannover Medical School, Carl-Neuberg-Straße 1, 30625, Hannover, Germany.
Medizinische Hochschule Hannover · DEDüsseldorf University Hospital · DEElbe Kliniken Stade-Buxtehude · DEJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DEKerckhoff Klinik · DEKlinikum Links der Weser · DEMedical University of Vienna · ATParacelsus Medizinische Privatuniversität · DETechnische Universität Dresden · DEUnfallkrankenhaus Berlin · DEUniversitätsklinikum des Saarlandes · DEUniversitätsklinikum Würzburg · DEUniversity Hospital Medical Center Bezanijska kosa · RSUniversity Hospital Regensburg · DEUniversity of Bremen · DEUniversity of Freiburg · DE

Funding

Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KG1303Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung 01KG1907
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe present study aimed to develop a simple dosing score when starting the cardiac glycoside digitoxin in heart failure with reduced ejection fraction (HFrEF) employing first data from the randomized, double-blinded DIGIT-HF trial. METHODS AND

resultsIn DIGIT-HF, digitoxin was started with a dose of 0.07 mg once daily (o.d.) in all patients. For score derivation, 317 patients were analyzed who had been randomized to digitoxin. In these patients, after scheduled determination of serum levels at study week 6, the digitoxin dose had remained unchanged or had been reduced to 0.05 mg o.d. (97% of patients) to achieve serum concentrations within a predefined range (10.5-23.6 nmol/l). In logistic regression analyses, sex, age, body mass index (BMI), and estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) were associated with need for dose reduction and, therefore, selected for further developing the dosing score. Optimal cut-points were derived from ROC curve analyses. Finally, female sex, age ≥ 75 years, eGFR < 50 ml/min/1.73 m

conclusionIn patients with HFrEF, treatment with digitoxin should be started at 0.05 mg o.d. in subjects with either female sex, eGFR < 50 ml/min/1.73m

Indexed as

Heart FailureAgedDigitoxinFemaleHumansROC CurveSensitivity and SpecificityStroke VolumeDigitoxinCardiac glycosidesClinical trialDigitoxinDose titrationHeart failure

Identifiers

PMID37087503
PMCPMC10359203
OpenAlexW4366759828

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.