ArticleBMC pulmonary medicine2023
Co-infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nocardia farcinica in a COPD patient: a case report.
Article in BMC pulmonary medicine, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Article
- Concurrent Pulmonary Detection of Nocardia beijingensis, Mycobacterium tuberculosis, and Mycobacterium fortuitum in a Liver Transplant Recipient.Journal of Brown hospital medicine · 2026Article
- Case Report: Pulmonary nocardiosis: three case reports and literature review.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Airway microbiome signature accurately discriminatesiScience · 2024Article
- Article
- Case report: From oral infection to life-threatening pneumonia: clinical considerations in Nocardia infection from a case.Frontiers in medicine · 2024Article
- Clinical screening of Nocardia in sputum smears based on neural networks.Frontiers in cellular and infection microbiology · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundChronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) is a common respiratory disease characterized by persistent airflow limitation. Infection with either Mycobacterium tuberculosis or Nocardia in COPD patients has been reported. However, co-infection with Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nocardia is rare. Herein, we described such a patient with COPD in a primary hospital, and the diagnosis process. CASE PRESENTATION: A 79-year-old female farmer with COPD was consecutively admitted to two hospitals with chief complaints of worsening cough, sputum and gasping since January10, 2022. Microbiological examination was not performed at the first hospital due to unknown reasons, and empirical antibiotic treatment was not effective. The patient was subsequently referred to our hospital. After screening the source of infection and the pathogen, she was diagnosed with tuberculosis. However, the patient did not benefit from antituberculosis treatment, with no remission of respiratory tract symptoms. Cerebrospinal fluid and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid specimens were subsequently sent for microbiological examination. The results indicated Mycobacterium tuberculosis and Nocardia.spp. After four days of bacterial culture, Nocardia.spp grew on medium, and Nocardia.farcinica was identified by the MALDI-TOF MS system and 16 s RNA. The patient was prescribed trimethoprim sulfamethoxazole (TMP/SMX) in combination with anti-tuberculosis drugs to treat the co-infection. She showed gradual improvement and was discharged from the hospital on February 19, 2022. However, the follow-up results were unclear.
conclusionsCo-infection with Nocardia and Mycobacterium tuberculosis should be considered in COPD patients. Repeated microbiological and microscopy examinations are essential in primary hospitals.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.