Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37086698›Full record

ArticleThe International journal on drug policy2023

The adoption and sustainability of digital therapeutics in justice systems: A pilot feasibility study.

Judith A Wilde, Kayla Zawislak, Ginnie Sawyer-Morris, Jessica Hulsey, Todd Molfenter, Faye S Taxman

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The International journal on drug policy, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
0.8field-weighted citation impact, top 27% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Judith A WildeSchar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, Van Metre Hall, Fifth Floor, 3351 Fairfax Drive, MS 3B1, Arlington, VA 22201, United States. Electronic address: jwilde2@gmu.edu.
Kayla ZawislakAddiction Policy Forum, 4701 Sangamore Rd, Suite 100N, Bethesda, MD 20816, United States.
Ginnie Sawyer-MorrisAddiction Policy Forum, 4701 Sangamore Rd, Suite 100N, Bethesda, MD 20816, United States.
Jessica HulseyAddiction Policy Forum, 4701 Sangamore Rd, Suite 100N, Bethesda, MD 20816, United States.
Todd MolfenterCollege of Engineering, University of Wisconsin, 1513 University Ave., 4103 Mechanical Engineering Building, Madison, WI 53706, United States.
Faye S TaxmanSchar School of Policy and Government, George Mason University, Van Metre Hall, Fifth Floor, 3351 Fairfax Drive, MS 3B1, Arlington, VA 22201, United States.
George Mason University · USUniversity of Wisconsin–Madison · US

Funding

Technical Assistance CoreU2CDA050097 · NIDA · GEORGE MASON UNIVERSITY · PI Todd David Molfenter, Jessica Hulsey Nickel · 2019 to 2026
$37.0M
NIDA NIH HHS U2C DA050097
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThis study explored whether participants with substance use disorder (SUD) would adopt and use a smart-phone app with a cognitive behavioral therapy program, weekly Brief Addiction Monitor (BAM) assessments, daily check-ins, tools to track sobriety and treatment, and other patient-centered resources. In addition, participants with SUD could access a social worker and peer support specialists.

methodsThe study sought participants from two groups: those referred by a justice-related agency and participants who responded to outreach from the Addiction Policy Forum (APF). The Connections smart-phone app was offered to both groups. The study examined use of the app and social worker/peer recovery support services by participants who downloaded and used the app; those referred by a justice-related agency and those who self-referred through APF. The app provided primary data, including socio-demographics, referral status, dates of use, activities completed, and BAM scores.

resultsThe app was offered to 1973 participants, 40% of whom downloaded it. Three groups emerged from among the 350 who used the app: those who used only the cognitive behavioral aspects of the app, those who used only the recovery support services offered, and those who used both the app and recovery support services. Looking at the two referral groups, the justice-referred group preferred telehealth recovery support services with the social worker; the self-referred group used the app and the app plus the recovery support services equally. Scores on the BAM improved across time. Justice-referred participants' protective behaviors improved more than those of the self-referred participants while self-referred participants' risk behaviors improved more than those of justice-referred participants. Older participants were more likely to use the app, and to report fewer risky behaviors, as measured by the BAM.

conclusionsUse of a digital therapeutic appears to support recovery of participants with SUD although many clients need and want the integration of social worker-driven recovery support services. Basically, the app can be an extension to personal services, but many people with SUD (particularly during COVID-19) crave human interaction. It also appears that those who seek assistance on their own, rather than being referred by a justice-related agency, may be more likely to benefit from digital therapeutics such as the Connections app.

Indexed as

Behavior, AddictiveCOVID-19Substance-Related DisordersFeasibility StudiesHumansSmartphoneDigital therapeuticsSubstance use disorderTelehealth and SUD

Identifiers

PMID37086698
PMCPMC12077357
OpenAlexW4366712942

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.