Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37086420›Full record

ArticleCentral European journal of public health2023

Assessing the impact of Hungary's public health product tax: an interrupted time series analysis.

Tímea Csákvári, Diána Elmer, Noémi Németh, Márk Komáromy, Réka Mihály-Vajda, Imre Boncz

Open access · bronzeAbstract read
PubMed Publisher
In one paragraph

Article in Central European journal of public health, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
1.4field-weighted citation impact, top 19% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 5 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Tímea CsákváriInstitute for Health Insurance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Diána ElmerInstitute for Health Insurance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Noémi NémethInstitute for Health Insurance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Márk KomáromyInstitute for Health Insurance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Réka Mihály-VajdaNational Laboratory on Human Reproduction, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
Imre BonczInstitute for Health Insurance, Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Pecs, Pecs, Hungary.
University of Pecs · HU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectivesImposing taxes on unhealthy goods can generate income, raise people's health awareness, and eventually decrease the prevalence of chronic diseases. Our aim was to assess the impact of Hungary's public health product tax (PHPT) since its implementation in September 2011. Differences in purchasing habits between households with different income statuses were also compared.

methodsA retrospective, descriptive analysis of tax bases and income was carried out, and an interrupted time series analysis using the generalised least squares method was performed to examine the changes in trends regarding the purchase of taxable products before and after the implementation of the tax. The amount of tax base (in kilograms or litres), income (in HUF and EUR), and annual purchased quantity of food and beverage groups per household were assessed. Data were derived from the National Tax and Customs Administration of Hungary and the Hungarian Household Budget and Living Conditions Surveys. The study sample was composed of households who participated in the surveys (mean = 8,359, SD = 1,146) between 2006 and 2018.

resultsThe households' tax bases and incomes increased constantly (with a few exceptions). The total revenue was 19.49 billion HUF (67.37 million EUR) in 2012 and 59.19 billion HUF (168.55 million EUR) in 2020. However, the households' purchasing habits did not change as expected. A significant short-term decrease (between 2012 and 2013) in purchasing unhealthy goods was observed for three groups: soft drinks (p = 0.009), jams (p = 0.047), and fruit juices (p = 0.038). Only soft drinks showed a significant decreasing trend in the post-intervention period between 2012 and 2018 (p < 0.001).

conclusionsWe concluded that the PHPT did not decrease households' unhealthy food purchasing trend, although it has a positive effect as it can create revenue for health care and health-promoting programmes.

Indexed as

Public HealthTaxesBeveragesCommerceHumansHungaryInterrupted Time Series AnalysisRetrospective Studiesfood and beveragesHungarypublic healthtaxation

Identifiers

PMID37086420
OpenAlexW4366743000

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.