Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37086291›Full record

Observational studyTechniques in coloproctology2023

Proctitis in patients with monkeypox infection: a single-center analysis of 42 consecutive cases from a multidisciplinary observational study on monkeypox proctitis.

J Guevara-Martínez, F Prieto La-Noire, P Arteaga-Asensio, I Pascual-Miguelañez, R Moraes Souza, M Quiles, M Montes, C Fondevila, M Álvarez-Gallego, Monkeypox multidisciplinary collaboration group

Open access · hybridAbstract readObservational Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in Techniques in coloproctology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.8field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review of Various Perianal Lesions on CT and MRI.Journal of the Korean Society of Radiology · 2025
    Review
  3. Proctitis and Other Gastrointestinal Manifestations in Mpox Disease: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2025
    Review
  4. Review
  5. Human Monkeypox ProctitisBalkan medical journal · 2024
    Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

J Guevara-MartínezGeneral and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
F Prieto La-NoireGeneral and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
P Arteaga-AsensioGeneral and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
I Pascual-MiguelañezGeneral and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
R Moraes SouzaDermatology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
M QuilesMicrobiology Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
M MontesInternal Medicine Department, Hospital Universitario La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
C FondevilaGeneral and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
M Álvarez-GallegoGeneral and Digestive Surgery, Hospital Universitario La Paz. Universidad Autónoma de Madrid, Madrid, Spain. mario.alvarezg@estudiante.uam.es.ORCID 0000-0002-8356-4658
Monkeypox multidisciplinary collaboration group
Hospital Universitario La Paz · ES

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundThe current monkeypox (MP) virus outbreak was declared an international emergency in July 2022. The aim of this report is to describe our initial experience with patients with MP, focusing on proctitis.

methodsWe conducted an observational study between 20 May and 31 July 2022, on patients with MP at a reference tertiary center in Madrid, Spain. A descriptive analysis on MP was performed, focusing on its characteristics, symptoms, diagnosis, and outcomes.

resultsA total of 143 positive MP cases were diagnosed in our center; 42 of them [all male, median age 39 years (range: 22-57 years)] had proctitis (29.37%), and 3 patients (2.09%/MP total cases and 7.14%/MP proctitis) required surgical drainage of a perianal abscess.

conclusionsGeneral and digestive surgeons must be aware of the presence of proctological impairment and complications due to MP virus.

Indexed as

Anus DiseasesColorectal SurgeryMpox, MonkeypoxProctitisAbscessAdultHumansMaleMiddle AgedYoung AdultAnal abscessMonkeypoxOutbreakProctitisSurgical drainage

Identifiers

PMID37086291
PMCPMC10638120
OpenAlexW4366742479

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.