Evidence map›Paper›PMID 37085996›Full record

ArticleBiophysical journal2023

Stability of asymmetric cell division: A deformable cell model of cytokinesis applied to C. elegans.

Maxim Cuvelier, Jef Vangheel, Wim Thiels, Herman Ramon, Rob Jelier, Bart Smeets

Open access · hybridAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biophysical journal, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
13citing papers in PubMed
1.9field-weighted citation impact, top 10% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

13 citing papers in PubMed, 22 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Stress-dependent growth in breast cancer arises from a mechano-osmotic coupling and cell-sizing checkpoint.Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Osmotic Pressure and Its Biological Implications.International journal of molecular sciences · 2024
    Review
  13. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Maxim CuvelierMeBioS, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium; Prometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium. Electronic address: bart.smeets@kuleuven.be.
Jef VangheelMeBioS, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium; Prometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
Wim ThielsCMPG, M2S Department, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
Herman RamonMeBioS, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
Rob JelierCMPG, M2S Department, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium.
Bart SmeetsMeBioS, Department of Biosystems, KU Leuven, Heverlee, Belgium; Prometheus, Division of Skeletal Tissue Engineering, KU Leuven, Leuven, Belgium.
KU Leuven · BE

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cell division during early embryogenesis is linked to key morphogenic events such as embryo symmetry breaking and tissue patterning. It is thought that the physical surrounding of cells together with cell intrinsic cues act as a mechanical "mold," guiding cell division to ensure these events are robust. To quantify how cell division is affected by the mechanical and geometrical environment, we present a novel computational mechanical model of cytokinesis, the final phase of cell division. Simulations with the model reproduced experimentally observed furrow dynamics and describe the volume ratio of daughter cells in asymmetric cell divisions, based on the position and orientation of the mitotic spindle. For dividing cells in geometrically confined environments, we show how the orientation of confinement relative to the division axis modulates the volume ratio in asymmetric cell division. Further, we quantified how cortex viscosity and surface tension determine the shape of a dividing cell and govern bubble-instabilities in asymmetric cell division. Finally, we simulated the formation of the three body axes via sequential (a)symmetric divisions up until the six-cell stage of early C. elegans development, which proceeds within the confines of an eggshell. We demonstrate how model input parameters spindle position and orientation provide sufficient information to reliably predict the volume ratio of daughter cells during the cleavage phase of development. However, for egg geometries perturbed by compression, the model predicts that a change in confinement alone is insufficient to explain experimentally observed differences in cell volume. This points to an effect of the compression on the spindle positioning mechanism. Additionally, the model predicts that confinement stabilizes asymmetric cell divisions against bubble-instabilities.

Indexed as

Caenorhabditis elegansCaenorhabditis elegans ProteinsAnimalsAsymmetric Cell DivisionCell DivisionCytokinesisSpindle ApparatusCaenorhabditis elegans Proteins

Identifiers

PMID37085996
PMCPMC10209142
OpenAlexW4366483321

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.